User talk:Ampha

Welcome!
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:


 * [[Image:Crystal Clear app ksmiletris.png|23px]]  Introduction
 * 5     The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * [[Image:Crystal package utilities.png|23px]]  How to edit a page
 * [[Image:Crystal khelpcenter.png|23px]]  Help
 * [[Image:Crystal Clear app ktip.png|23px]]  Tips
 * [[Image:Crystal Clear app ksokoban.png|23px|]]  How to write a great article
 * [[Image:Crystal_Clear_app_kedit.png|23px]]  Manual of Style
 * [[Image:Nuvola apps konquest.png|23px]]  Fun stuff...

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Kralizec! (talk) 14:46, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Sony Ericsson W700
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sony Ericsson W700, and it appears to include a substantial copy of. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:17, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Sony Ericsson W700, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Advertising, copyvio

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dawn bard (talk) 03:19, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Sony Ericsson W700
A tag has been placed on Sony Ericsson W700, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Sting_au   Talk  03:18, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. An article is not a place for comment on the subject. The Talk page is meant for that. -- Rodhullandemu  (Talk) 13:54, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Why are we doing this?
Why you doing this?

by this, I presume you mean having article on the images controversy? we do this because Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia the tries to ensure a broad coverage of notable historical and contemporary events. That article exists because it fulfils our primary objective of informing people of such events.

Its mean if I provide you some abusive material which is related with privileges (Not Prophet) of Christianity & jaws will you put out on your website? Because ‘’ Wikipedia is an encyclopedia’’

What is the rule of journalism?

Wikipedia is not a news site, it therefore does not follow the role the rules of journalism but instead follows its own policies and guidelines which the article is in compliance with.

''If you don’t know I tell you. 1> Don’t publish that things which create extremism 2> Don’t interfere in the courts system 3> Don’t insult against law full Governess 4> Don’t publish that material whish is against the relationship of two countries 5> Don’t publish that material in whish your subject are religious legend''

I'm afraid I do not recognize his rules, and in fact I can think of occasions where newspapers have and should break all of these. In addition, as mentioned above Wikipedia follows its own policies and guidelines.

For reference Please reade 1>The Copyright Kand book by Wall Howard published by Waster-Guptill Publications, New York 2>The court;The press & the Public by Harris Brain published by Barry Rose Publication 3>Interpretative Reporting by Curtis D. MacDovhau publish by The MacMillan New York

Is your religion allowing you to insult other religions?

the religion of our editors is irrelevant and plays no bearing on our policies and guidelines. Moreover, many of our editors are atheists (and I count myself in this number) and therefore would not be acting on the part of one religion to offend another.

If you are atheists its don’t means that you publish that material which cause religious or mentally prejudices. Remember man should keep its internal value.

''If your answer is yes than sorry for that you are fundamentalist. We cannot blame other religions because of some awful people, means we cannot blame Christianity because Hitler killed lots of Jews.''

I have no idea what this means.

You Can't understant its meane because you are atheists

Liberty is not means you do anything what you wants but it means you do your act rationally.

this is incorrect, even if it is not rational.

''We can say this liberty means the exploring of thoughts not constricted thoughts which make you fundamental. That person is real illiterate. If some of us hate you because of your steps which you take against Muslims. Think about this.''

Wikipedia does not bow to threat or intimidation.

--Fredrick day (talk) 14:21, 1 March 2008 (UTC)