User talk:Amrit Ghimire Ranjit/Archive 1

August 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=566969567 your edit] to Gram atom may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:38, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
 * AmRit GhiMire 'Ranjit' 10:25, 3 August 2013

Your contributed article, Anomalous expansion of water


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Anomalous expansion of water. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Water. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Water – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions.  Dewritech (talk)  14:57, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Gram atom


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Gram atom. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Gram atomic mass. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Gram atomic mass – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Mat ty. 007 20:16, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Amrit.ghimire13, you are invited to the Teahouse
Hi Amrit.ghimire13, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled right to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! AmRit GhiMire &#39;Ranjit&#39; (talk) 15:26, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you have been adding your signature to some of your edits to articles. This is a common mistake to make and has probably already been corrected. Please do not sign your edits to article content, as the article's edit history serves the function of attributing contributions, so you only need to use your signature to make discussions more readable, such as on article talk pages or project pages such as the Village Pump. If you would like further information about distinguishing types of pages, please see What is an article?. Again, thank you for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Thank you. Jac 16888 Talk 13:56, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

About your message to my talk page.
Oh, you have mistake me with Lonedirewolf, he is that page's creator, not me. I just edit and design that page, not concern with content. Send your message to the right person. Sincerely. Ke ac lam viec tot (talk) 14:06, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Dotan (singer)
Hello Amrit.ghimire13. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Dotan (singer), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Significance asserted - songs that have charted - enough to pass WP:A7 . Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 14:14, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Re: Featured topic candidates/Nepal/archive1
Hello, I am one of the delegates at Featured topic candidates, and I would like to point out that I failed your nomination of a Nepal topic at Featured topic candidates/Nepal/archive1 because it does not satisfy the criteria for a featured topic. Specifically, criterion 3, which states that all articles in a topic must at least be good articles, featured lists or featured articles, and since none of the articles in the proposed topic were at least GA, FL or FA, I failed the topic. Please read over the criteria again before proposing another topic in the future, thank you.--  十  八  21:15, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:UserAmrit Ghimire.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:UserAmrit Ghimire.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 15:45, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Stop Gadimai Petition
I have deleted this page, which is not suitable for an encyclopedia. Please read Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion. JohnCD (talk) 22:21, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014
You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Hindu astrology. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Bladesmulti (talk) 11:45, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Actually that is making the article some how nation centric So I think it is necessary to revert that edit.

Category:Obtut
Category:Obtut, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 21:32, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * For your reference, another editor has kindly created User:Amrit Ghimire Ranjit/Obtut for you. – Fayenatic  L ondon 07:19, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Aakaanksha Singh
THe BLPPROD was declined - you cannot add it back. Either use a normal PROD, or go for Ron h jones (Talk) 22:55, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Summer love (novel)


A tag has been placed on Summer love (novel) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://hamroawaz.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/summer-love-novel.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BethNaught (talk) 14:00, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Summer love (novel) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Summer love (novel) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Summer love (novel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bladesmulti (talk) 04:48, 6 October 2014 (UTC)