User talk:Amulumudi/Courts of South Africa

Here is the link to my peer review; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Amulumudi/Courts_of_South_Africa/Literally_Legally_Blonde_Peer_Review

General info[edit] Whose work are you reviewing? Amulumudi

Link to draft you're reviewing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Amulumudi/Courts_of_South_Africa?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template Link to the current version of the article (if it exists) Courts of South Africa Evaluate the drafted changes[edit] (Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

There is nothing in the sandbox yet to peer review. I will do a review of the main page article.

Article Overall Opinion[edit] Lead and Opening[edit] The first thing I noticed was the large photograph of the schematic of the African Court system. I think the placement of this is distracting. It should go lower down in the article.

The lead provides a detailed overview of the rest of the article. Maybe make it more concise, but I think it is written well. The tone could be revised a little (e.g. "Despite South Africa's division into nine provinces, the country has a single national court system" makes the tone sound surprised or contradictory).

Content[edit] The Constitution section is full of good content. It could be expanded. I found it brief. Same thing with the Supreme Court of Appeal.

References[edit] The reference list is very short. There needs to be more sources added here to back up all of the information on the page. There are few citations throughout.