User talk:Amuratc77

July 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Turkish invasion of Cyprus, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. StartOkayStop (talk) 04:30, 21 July 2022 (UTC)


 * How is it not constructive if the Wikipedia that is supposed to be objective on the historical mastter shares biased pointThe word of invasion is factually inaccurate since Turkey does not own the north cyprus, Turkish Cypricontrolshthat region while ere Turkey simply provides protection as a guarantor. If you are telling me Wikipedia is not interested in Historical facts then I won't waste my time. . Amuratc77 (talk) 04:43, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Turkish invasion of Cyprus. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Cannolis (talk) 04:42, 21 July 2022 (UTC)


 * It certainly not vandalism if you don't like my contribution you may state so but simply sharing a propaganda and when someone decides to change it the historical inaccuracy and calling it vandalism is quite an attidude! I guess the articles on Wikipedia does not belong to every, as someone who has supported Wikipedia in the past. I note it and understand these intolerances quite well. Thanks!one Amuratc77 (talk) 04:46, 21 July 2022 (UTC)