User talk:Amy.s.lithium

March 2016
Hello. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The Matrix Revolutions has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 20:25, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Matrix Revolutions. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 20:26, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Matrix Revolutions, you may be blocked from editing. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 20:26, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Matrix Revolutions. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 20:26, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at The Matrix Revolutions shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 20:27, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Amy.s.lithium, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 20:27, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued disruption. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 02:28, 31 March 2016 (UTC)