User talk:AmyPie412

March 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Beacon Street Girls has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. &mdash;αlεx•mullεr 20:15, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Brooke Shields constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. J.d ela noy gabs adds 20:15, 10 March 2008 (UTC))

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to I Think I'm a Clone Now. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Will (talk) 20:32, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Erica Lucas
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Erica Lucas, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Erica Lucas. J Milburn (talk) 18:13, 29 March 2008 (UTC)