User talk:Amyfairygreen2

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for experimenting with our encyclopedia. The test edit you made worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Tips on starting your first article
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or type  here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Yves (talk) 03:43, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Loud
Hi there. I'd like to know how you think Loud is charting at number three in Australia. The reference you posted was to an Irish chart site, which shows it at number two in the Republic. The chart has not been released yet, but will in a couple of hours, so I do not know how in the world you are getting this information. Yves (talk) 03:50, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

The top 5 ARIA charts for singles in Albums and Singles was released in the Herald Sun Newspaper in Melbourne, Australia. It stated on the Albums chart that Loud charted at #3 for this week .I Apologize for my error in referencing, but there is no need for you to be rude :) Don't believe me, check in the charts soon.
 * To Yvesnimmo,
 * Thanks for the reply. My intention was not to be rude, but to be neutral-borderline-positive yet curiously inquisitive. And I did not realize they were published in the Harold Sun: are they always correct? And do you know if the top five is published online, as well? Yves (talk) 04:05, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

--- Its O.k :) Yes they are always correct. Its not online unfortunately.
 * Well that's unfortunate. If you would like to add it, you could always reference the newspaper, if you have a copy of it, so you know information like volume and page number. WP:CIT has many helpful citation templates you can use. :) Also, if you are not aware, talk page posts should always be signed with four tildes ( ~ ). Yves (talk) 04:17, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Rihanna discography
Hi again. Please don't rearrange columns with no explanation or reason, like you did in these edits. Thank you. Yves (talk) 05:19, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Screen shot 2010-11-28 at 4.22.58 PM.png
Thanks for uploading File:Screen shot 2010-11-28 at 4.22.58 PM.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 14:33, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Ny models-Shanina-1912.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ny models-Shanina-1912.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 14:35, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kasia Zachwieja


The article Kasia Zachwieja has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article relies heavily on agency/management profiles for verification; in terms of 3rd party coverage, I can only come up with brief references to her as a footballer's girlfriend.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Mbinebri  talk &larr; 19:56, 28 December 2011 (UTC)