User talk:Amykalner

Welcome!

Hello, Amykalner, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 20:18, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Speedy deletion nomination of Mic ( Michael ) Neumann


A tag has been placed on Mic ( Michael ) Neumann requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. —C.Fred (talk) 20:18, 16 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Additionally, the article appears to be a copy of his biography from IMDB. The terms of use of IMDB indicate that the text is not under a free license, so using it verbatim on Wikipedia is an infringement of copyright. —C.Fred (talk) 20:20, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mic ( Michael ) Neumann
A tag has been placed on Mic ( Michael ) Neumann, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Moreover, please add more verifiable sources, not only 3rd party sources. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Hairhorn (talk) 20:41, 16 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Talk:Mic ( Michael ) Neumann still exists if you want to discuss the deletion and necessary corrections there. Alternately, you can ask questions here, on your user talk page. —C.Fred (talk) 20:45, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mic (Michael) Neumann


A tag has been placed on Mic (Michael) Neumann requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. —C.Fred (talk) 21:32, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Dubtitled should not hijack another article
I see you've created an article for Dubtitled, which I have reservations about whether it is a notable company. However, in the process, you also hijacked the article Dubtitle, filling it with information about Dubtitled. Keep the topics separate. At most, there should be a hatnote on the Dubtitle article, not a full description of Dubtitled. —C.Fred (talk) 21:45, 16 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Apparently the community already came to the conclusion that the company isn't notable: see Articles for deletion/Dubtitled Entertainment. Accordingly, your article on Dubtitled was deleted under speedy delete criterion G4, reposting of material deleted after a discussion. —C.Fred (talk) 21:48, 16 February 2011 (UTC)


 * And the same goes for the one about Neumann: Articles for deletion/Mic Neumann. Favonian (talk) 21:53, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Please simply "Google" the term "DUBTITLED" and "Mic Neumann" then see what comes up as notable or not. I thought I was contributing to Wikipedia's idea of referencing as much as possible. Both entries have existed in the media matrix for years. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amykalner (talk • contribs) 22:05, 16 February 2011 (UTC)


 * I didn't see anything in those two article that showed a big change from when the AfDs were held. Accordingly, the community consensus from the discussions still holds.


 * If you think there's been a significant change, you might want to start a draft of the new articles in your user space (e.g., User:Amykalner/Mic Neumann). Make sure to add reliable sources, references, clear assertions of notability, etc. Once you think you have the article in good shape, ask for feedback on it. If it's significantly improved, we'll help you move it into the main encyclopedia or start a deletion review discussion on whether it should be moved. —C.Fred (talk) 22:26, 16 February 2011 (UTC)