User talk:Amyseekuif

February 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Jennifer Hudson (album) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 22:29, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to the page Jennifer Hudson (album) constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. J.delanoy gabs adds 22:55, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Lindsay Lohan
There were several problems with your edits:

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Ward3001 (talk) 16:18, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * You deleted information with a proper source:

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
 * You added information sourced with a tabloid:

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ward3001 (talk) 16:18, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * You wrote your own interpretation of her music:

Edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Ward3001 (talk) 17:33, 23 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I omitted the source you did not like. If you revert anything on this article in the next 24 hours, I will immediately make a WP:3RR report, and you will be blocked from editing. Ward3001 (talk) 18:10, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Lindsay Lohan. Alansohn (talk) 18:15, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

You are asking for a block
You have been given a final warning above by another editor. You have already violated WP:3RR. Consider this your second final warning. Revert anything in Lindsay Lohan again in the next 24 hours and you will be blocked. Ward3001 (talk) 18:19, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.


 * Did you notice all those WP:3RR warnings, up above? Might have been a good idea to read those. – Luna Santin  (talk) 20:56, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

is anyone gonna reply to my unblock request.......i've been waiting alot.............

I unblocked you. Please, familiarize yourself with 3 revert rule (and other Wikipedia policies). Edit warring is frowned upon here. Instead of reverting you should have discussed necessary changes with other editors on the article's talk page. Ruslik (talk) 16:45, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

On the 6/J-Lo
A tag has been placed on On the 6/J-Lo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bingo-101a (talk • contribs) 23:17, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

In case you didn't notice, the album has already been released entitled "The Singles Collection". Type it into google search and you'll get several pages validating the veracity of said statement. Next time you try and change the page I will report you for vandalism. Alexander.hugh.george (talk) 00:35, 25 February 2009 (UTC)Alex

 You have been blocked for disruptive editing. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator. For alternative methods to appeal, see Appealing a block. Daniel Case (talk) 03:25, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

why isnt anyone unblocking me, it says on Blocking policy and Appealing a block, that administrators should not unblock users without discussing with the blocking admin except in cases where the block is clearly unjustified."

and this block is clearly unjustified.......so, someone unblock me....

WHATS TAKING SO LONG TO ANSWER THE UNJUSTIFIED UNBLOCK REQUEST......WHY DO I HAVE TO WAIT LIKE 10 HOURS BEFORE SOMEONE CHECKS IT......

BUT THIS IS NOT FAIR.........I WAS JUST REMOVING FALSE INFORMATION.........WHY CANT ANYONE UNDERSTAND THAT........PLEASE LET ME EXPLAIN MYSELF......

THIS IS THE MOST UNFAIR/UNJUSTIFIED BLOCK IVE SEEN IN ON WIKIPEDIA...........

You can see the reasons given for your block at this link. I fully understand that you think you were making valid edits, but doing the same action repeatedly without discussion, typing in caps, and trouble assuming good faith on the part of other editors is the main cause of the problem here. You're sure to find people around Wikipedia who disagree with you, but it's important to collaborate with them anyway, and definitely best to remain civil about it. Like I said, I hope you will have a more enjoyable time after your block ends. Dekimasu よ! 16:00, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

BUT I WASNT DISRUPTING ANYTHING......I WILL NOT ACCEPT TO WAIT FOR THIS BLOCK TO END............IT MUST END NOW.........I WAS JUST REMOVING UNSOURCED UNTRUE FALSE INFORMATION.......

Please take a little time out to read WP:CHILL. Dekimasu よ! 16:28, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
You have been accused of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Brexx. Thank you. Siawase (talk) 15:29, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Explain
Can someone tell me why im not able to edit protected pages anymore......like, the pages of Jennifer Lopez and Lindsay Lohan, i dont get it.....i was able to edit them before.....why now im not able??