User talk:Amyth1116

September 2023
Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia, and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Hero. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use your sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. Tetrainn (talk) 13:25, 26 September 2023 (UTC)


 * What in the the text i wrote was a "Joke"? Amyth1116 (talk) 13:30, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I added new examples of Heros, such as Hercules or Prometheus, I also added that Heros can do deeds for the greater good or for minorities. Amyth1116 (talk) 13:31, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Hero. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. AgisdeSparte (talk) 13:38, 26 September 2023 (UTC)


 * How is "Or to help the greater good or minorities in the story. Such as Prometheus stealing Fire for the humans." Vandalism? Heroes in stories SUCH AS Prometheus help the lesser party in a Heroic act to save them or help them from their lesser state AKA saving them in a heroic act. Please explain how that is vandalism. Amyth1116 (talk) 13:41, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 * @Amyth1116 Thank you for reaching out and expressing your concerns regarding the recent edits you've made on Wikipedia. We understand that you believe your contributions are not vandalism, but it's important to clarify the situation.
 * It appears that there has been a conflict of editing on the page in question, which is commonly referred to as an "edit war." An edit war occurs when multiple editors repeatedly make changes to a page without reaching a consensus. Wikipedia aims to be a collaborative platform where information is added based on reliable sources and follows established guidelines.
 * In this case, your edits were reverted by @Tetrainn who may have felt that the changes did not meet Wikipedia's standards. It is essential to remember that Wikipedia articles should be based on verifiable sources and contribute to the overall development of the article. When adding information, it should be well-sourced and relevant to the topic being discussed.
 * To resolve this issue, we encourage you to engage in a constructive discussion with the other user on the article's talk page. Seek consensus on the changes you want to make and provide reliable sources to support your contributions. Remember that Wikipedia operates on a policy of verifiability, so ensuring that your edits are supported by credible references is crucial.
 * We appreciate your dedication to contributing to Wikipedia and hope that this information helps you understand the situation better. Please don't hesitate to reach out if you have any further questions or need assistance with the editing process. AgisdeSparte (talk) 13:46, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 * @AgisdeSparte I have reported him to AIV. Tetrainn (talk) 13:48, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Ok np then AgisdeSparte (talk) 13:49, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Hero, you may be blocked from editing. AgisdeSparte (talk) 13:52, 26 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Please explain how my editing is disruptive? I am adding information that goes along with the writing. Amyth1116 (talk) 13:55, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 * See above AgisdeSparte (talk) 13:55, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 * admin will explain you by blocking. Tetrainn (talk) 13:56, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 * For what reason should I be blocked? I am adding information to this article. Nothing of what I am saying is disruptive. Amyth1116 (talk) 14:02, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 * @Amyth1116 I appreciate your patience, and I'm here to provide further clarification on the issue at hand. It seems there might still be some confusion, so let me address it from a different angle.
 * The primary concern regarding your recent edits on Wikipedia is not necessarily the content itself but rather the process by which these changes were made. When editing Wikipedia, it's crucial to follow a collaborative approach. This means consulting with other users and working together to achieve a consensus.
 * The problem arises from the fact that the changes you made were not discussed or coordinated with other users who are also contributing to the same article. This lack of consultation led to what is commonly referred to as an "edit war." An edit war occurs when different editors repeatedly make changes to an article without reaching an agreement on the content.
 * Wikipedia is designed to be a platform where information is added, modified, and improved through consensus-building and the use of reliable sources. When you engage in an edit war to assert your version of the article, it disrupts the collaborative editing process and can lead to conflicts.
 * To address this situation, we recommend taking a step back and initiating a discussion with other users on the article's "Talk" page. Share your proposed changes, explain your rationale, and be open to feedback from others. Collaboration and consensus are core principles of Wikipedia, and by working together, you can arrive at a version of the article that is well-sourced, balanced, and reflective of the collective knowledge of the Wikipedia community.
 * We appreciate your dedication to contributing to Wikipedia, and we hope this explanation helps clarify the issue. If you have any more questions or require further guidance, please feel free to reach out.
 * Sincerely, AgisdeSparte (talk) 14:05, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 * @Amyth1116 Three different editors disagreed from your BS
 * additions, It means you have no consensus. Tetrainn (talk) 14:08, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 * My BS? My BS was adding new information to an article to help better it. Amyth1116 (talk) 14:10, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I did ask, I asked many times how what I wrote was disruptive or Vandalism. I didn't get and reply for that. What I wrote in my option adds better explanation on some Characteristics of a Hero, SUCH AS Prometheus Heroic act to give Fire to the lesser Minority. AKA Humans. Amyth1116 (talk) 14:09, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Regarding your additions to the article about Hero, your point about Prometheus and his heroic act of giving fire to humans may be significant. However, the reason your edits have faced resistance could be related to the specific focus on Prometheus. Wikipedia articles strive for a balanced and comprehensive view, so choosing one hero over others for specific characteristics can sometimes be a point of contention.
 * To address this and further discuss the inclusion of Prometheus or other heroes in the context of heroic characteristics, it would be beneficial to initiate a conversation on the "Talk" page of the article about Heroes. AgisdeSparte (talk) 14:13, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Prometheus was simply an EXAMPLE of a hero who has shown these characteristics, just like the other examples listed on the page. Amyth1116 (talk) 14:16, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 * When it comes to Wikipedia articles, the introduction typically serves as a concise summary of the main points covered in the article itself. If Prometheus is mentioned in the introduction, it should be because his heroic characteristics are significant and thoroughly discussed within the article.
 * That said, the most important aspect here is to foster a collaborative editing environment on Wikipedia. Edit wars and persistent attempts to push edits without consensus can disrupt the community's efforts to create high-quality articles. I encourage you to engage in discussions on the article's "Talk" page, as mentioned earlier, and work together with other editors to determine the best way to represent the heroic characteristics you want to highlight.
 * By following the established Wikipedia guidelines and working collaboratively with the community, we can ensure that the articles remain accurate, well-sourced, and informative. AgisdeSparte (talk) 14:19, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I re-did my edit in a way that DOES NOT include Prometheus's name, and that was still removed. I took your point of focusing of Prometheus and removed it. However, like mentioned my edit was still removed. Amyth1116 (talk) 14:22, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Hero.  BelowTheSun  (T•C) 14:19, 26 September 2023 (UTC)


 * How was I vandalizing. What was so wrong with what I wrote. Amyth1116 (talk) 14:26, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Blocked 36 hours; if you resume edit-warring or disruption when this block expires, your next block will be indefinite
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:50, 26 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Upgraded to indef, TPA revoked.OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:19, 26 September 2023 (UTC)