User talk:An-Nadeem

December 2008
Permission received from copyright owner to use the material from their website.

Removal of copyright volation tags
Hi An-Nadeem. I see that you have deleted the copyright violation notices that were placed here on your talk page. That is fine. However, it is not permitted for you to remove the copyright notices from articles -- as you did with Mohamad Jebara and Cordova Academy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Please follow the instructions on the tags. You will need to wait for a WP administrator to remove them after the material has been checked. If you want to work on the article in the meantime, you can still do so in the temp space provided - and if it no longer contains any copyright violations, an administrator will move it back into the main space. I've gone ahead and copied the articles over to Talk:Mohamad Jebara/Temp and Talk:Cordova Academy/Temp for you. You can improve them there. I've also restored the notices on the original articles. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. — Cactus Writer |   needles  20:09, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Thank You for your co-operation. I have completely edited the articles and am continuously working to get them to Wikipedia standards. Much Appreciated.  An-Nadeem

 * Perhaps I wasn't clear. Please leave the original article it is. Work only on the articles here Talk:Mohamad Jebara/Temp and here Talk:Cordova Academy/Temp. The articles will be checked by an administrator within a few days. If the articles pass then the tags will be removed. Thanks. — Cactus Writer |   needles  20:26, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Permission received
An administrator has stated that permission has been received for use of the copyrighted material on both Mohamad Jebara and Cordova Academy. Tags were placed on the talk pages indicating such, and the violation notices were removed. I've copied and pasted the text from the temporary pages into the original because they contained more information which you had added and I thought you might like to save it. If you prefer the original text, you can always find it or revert back to it in the article history. At any rate, both articles are now open for further editing. Good luck. — Cactus Writer |   needles  09:52, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

March 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cordova Academy has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.  Staffwaterboy  Critique Me Guestbook Hate Comments 20:29, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page.  Pinkadelica Say it...  20:33, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

No Basis for Deletion Request
All material in this article is verifiable and well cited. Please feel free to check the citation. The request for deletion does not conform to the deletion guidelines. Thank You An-Nadeem

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 21:08, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

March 2009
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. - Kingpin13 (talk) 17:40, 5 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I have removed my contribution to wikipedia since you people seem to be so vigorously against my articles, I have removed their entire content. Please, use your time to contribute to the betterment of this world instead of wasting your time indulging in and slandering something you have no knowledge about. I am truly sorry that wikipedia is like this, I actually though it had some academic weight to it.  I have lost all respect for its so called credibility. A person who contributed nothing to it sparked all this, due to some envy they may harbor for this great institution and its honorable founder. Dear Moderator, please delete all my contributions to Wikipedia immediately and let everyone get on with their lives. an-Nadeem

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Mohamad Jebara. e0steven (☎Talk|✍Contrib) 17:51, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Don't take it personally
Hello there, I've noticed that you are angry because I nominated your articles for deletion. Please don't take it personally; the only reason why I nominated them for deletion is because I can see clearly that they don't meet the notability criteria. And what do you mean by my envy to the institution and its founder? I didn't know anything about the institution nor its founder until I read the articles. And even if I haven't nominated them, someone else will eventually notice them and nominate them to deletion because of notability concerns. Please understand that articles that don't meet the guidelines cannot be included in Wikipedia. (excuse my English because I'm not a native speaker.) Board55 (talk) 18:59, 5 March 2009 (UTC)