User talk:AnGo1981

Your article has been moved to AfC space
Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:AnGo1981/Heidrun Gerzymisch has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Heidrun Gerzymisch, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 08:27, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 19:45, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Heidrun_Gerzymisch
Hi,

I have submitted an article on Heidrun Gerzymisch that was not accepted due to missing reliable sources. As I am still quite unexperienced, could you please tell me what could be reliable sources in this respect and for which parts I would have to add them? Thank you very much in advance, kind regards. AnGo1981 (talk) 16:49, 11 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Hiyas there AnGo1981,


 * Reliable sources are external sources of information that can generally be trusted to provide decent quality information. Examples of this would be quality newspapers such as the New York times, Major magazines, News websites, University published books and so on. In effect a reliable source can be summed up as followed:
 * It is of sufficient size - This means that the source has sufficient following. If i were to write my own blog it wouldn't be a reliable source, whereas a large news website would be.
 * It can be trusted - The source has a good reputation for decent writing. The above mentioned blog wouldn't pass this criteria, since it would just be me writing it, without editorial control.
 * It is independent of the subject of the article - A somewhat trickier one. If something is closely related to a subject, it might not be entirely objective. For example: If a company would write a shareholder report they wouldn't mention that they are heavily polluting the environment and expecting a major loss.
 * Thus what you need is reliable article's that discuss the article's subject (Heidrun Gerzymisch). Seeing the "Research" section in the article, i am sure that he must have received credited for his work, and that this must be documented somewhere.  Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 18:02, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Loriski (talk) 14:22, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

A tip for you...
Hi AnGo1981,

I just reviewed your article and then noticed that you the above request for help with Reliable Sources on your page. As the subject of your article has published a lot of works, you may find that there are reviews of these works in academic journals, and these would count towards notability. Equally, bear in mind that your reliable sources do not have to be in English - so if you can find articles about her in German newspapers or journals etc. these would also be acceptable.

As I said in my review, I would strongly recommend that you cut down the size of the 'life and career' section quite substantially - unless you can find articles that are about her life in reliable sources - perhaps even limiting this to a brief description of her current position and her areas of specialisation (or what he is 'known' or 'noted' for). If you do this, and then find some reviews to back up the 'research' section of your article - i would imagine this would be enough to get it through...

Please feel free to drop me a note at my talk page if you've any further questions. And the Teahouse is a great place to go if you want advice from expert editors!

With all best,

Loriski (talk) 14:59, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

A tip for you...
Hi AnGo1981,

I just reviewed your article and then noticed that you the above request for help with Reliable Sources on your page. As the subject of your article has published a lot of works, you may find that there are reviews of these works in academic journals, and these would count towards notability. Equally, bear in mind that your reliable sources do not have to be in English - so if you can find articles about her in German newspapers or journals etc. these would also be acceptable.

As I said in my review, I would strongly recommend that you cut down the size of the 'life and career' section quite substantially - unless you can find articles that are about her life in reliable sources - perhaps even limiting this to a brief description of her current position and her areas of specialisation (or what she is 'known' or 'noted' for). If you do this, and then find some reviews to back up the 'research' section of your article - i would imagine this would be enough to get it through...

Please feel free to drop me a note at my talk page if you've any further questions. And the Teahouse is a great place to go if you want advice from expert editors!

With all best,

Loriski (talk) 14:59, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Heidrun Gerzymisch concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Heidrun Gerzymisch, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 14:01, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Heidrun Gerzymisch concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Heidrun Gerzymisch, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Heidrun Gerzymisch concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Heidrun Gerzymisch, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Heidrun Gerzymisch has been accepted
 Heidrun Gerzymisch, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!  DGG ( talk ) 03:38, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Heidrun_Gerzymisch help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.