User talk:Ana Isabel Santos Silva

April 2021
Hello, I'm Nehme1499. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Davide Diaw have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Nehme1499 12:25, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Raoul Island. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 11:32, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

A lengthy welcome
Hi Ana Isabel Santos Silva. Welcome to Wikipedia. I've added a welcome message to the top of this page that gives a great deal of information about Wikipedia. I hope you find it useful.

Additionally, I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily in collaboration.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

If you work from reliable, independent sources, you shouldn't go far wrong. WP:RSP and WP:RSN are helpful in determining if a source is reliable.

If you find yourself in a disagreement with another editor, it's best to discuss the matter on the relevant talk page.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Hipal (talk) 15:32, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing.  Acroterion   (talk)   00:30, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

What? You're biased. Ana Isabel Santos Silva (talk) 23:28, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Acroterion   (talk)   00:14, 11 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Just to add to the above, I will say that I have had a quick look at your editing history and you are incredibly lucky to only be blocked for 60 hours! You have been making antisemitic edits since May. This needs to stop now and stop permanently. If, once the block expires, I see even the slightest hint of any further antisemitism, or any other racism, from you (and that includes dog whistles) then this will almost certainly end in an indefinite block. --DanielRigal (talk) 00:59, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I missed that particular gem, but taken with these   , I've reconsidered and am blocking indefinitely. That amount of bigotry and attempts at disinformation are incompatible with editing here.   Acroterion   (talk)   01:22, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Acroterion   (talk)   01:23, 11 September 2021 (UTC)