User talk:Anabel 89

December 2021
You should read WP:OLINK. Many of your wikilinks violate that guideline. I have reverted a great many of your edits for that reason, and reverted some edits that are simply disruptive. Go more slowly.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:58, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello, would you please point out the edits, which you think have been disruptive? I would like to be aware of the mistakes you assume that I have made. Thank you. Anabel 89 (talk) 17:02, 2 December 2021 (UTC)Anabel 89

One more question. I just found out that you reverted the information I added to the Heathrow Airport Bombing article, although it was based on a rather reliable source - CNN. Why? Anabel 89 (talk) 17:11, 2 December 2021 (UTC) Anabel 89
 * You changed the number of wounded from 22, which was incorrect, to 25; the actual number The New York Times said was wounded was 23. You also added copyrighted material to the end of the article.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:18, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello! The CNN's article said 25 as you may see. As for the copyright material - I cited it diligently. However I will have in mind that I have to write down the facts in my own words. Have a nice evening. Anabel 89 (talk) 20:15, 2 December 2021 (UTC) Anabel 89

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Anabel 89! Your additions to Great Bricett have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 18:42, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello! Thank you for your detailed explanation. I will have these rules in mind. Anabel 89 (talk) 18:44, 2 December 2021 (UTC) Anabel 89

Delyan Peevski
Hi I had to revert your additions. It removes good information and adds non-specific information that is not about him to the article. It is really WP:NPOV, putting a spin on it. The only thing that is salient is the lawyer applying for removal, which I'll add in.  scope_creep Talk  17:40, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * It have reverted it. A 2nd reading seemed to do the business.   scope_creep Talk  17:41, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Dear scope_creep, I was just going to write to you when I saw that you reverted the changes. I think that they meet all the requirements of Wikipedia, having in mind that the article has multiple issues as pointed out at the beginning of it. Thank you for your help :-) Anabel 89