User talk:Anabella666777

April 2020
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ghosts (Michael Jackson song) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 14:57, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

I don’t agree with you. I think my contributions to Ghosts is very constructive for example where “ commentators made an observation about paranoid lyrics a common theme in Jackson’s songs “. First of all call MJ lyrics paranoid is very offensive because all MJ songs have a strong deep meaning. I don’t appreciate the word you guys used to describe MJ lyrics as paranoid- this is an direct assassination on MJ character and his legacy! I will not tolerate insults and lies that people still writing about Michael Jackson! He was tortured for decades by greedy malicious psychopaths and if this wasn’t enough they took his life!!! To say USA treated MJ badly would be understatement! MJ deserves justice! Anabella666777 (talk) 15:11, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Ghosts (Michael Jackson song). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Lcodyh803 (talk) 15:43, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Well look who is talking about adding their own point of view or personal analysis! Calling lyrics in Michael Jackson song Ghosts paranoid IS SOMEONE point of view or personal analysis! Stop insulting Michael Jackson and his legacy! If you don’t have anything nice to say- don’t say anything! Anabella666777 (talk) 15:53, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Main Page are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you.  Rob van  vee  19:12, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Thank you so much for explaining this to me. Anabella666777 (talk) 19:17, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

And Teahouse is a good place for Wikipedia beginners. Art LaPella (talk) 04:27, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Yes I have one specific question- how is calling Michael Jackson lyrics paranoid can improve the article?! And what kind of reliable sources insulting King of Pop calling & I quote- “ MJ lyrics paranoid is a common theme in MJ songs”- really?! The entire world calls MJ King of Pop, he is the greatest entertainer of all times & if his lyrics were paranoid he wouldn’t be a King of Pop. So please stop adding nasty adjectives to describe MJ music. Look at nowadays performers who can’t sing can’t dance ! Anabella666777 (talk) 19:28, 23 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Did you notice that "paranoid" sentence was removed just after your edits? Art LaPella (talk) 19:46, 23 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Yes I removed that sentence on April 12 after you edited it because it was not sourced in the article body and if you read it again it said "commentators described the song...". Also, it is important to remember that it is not Wikipedia and its editors job to right great wrongs so we only convey what reliable sources say, not our own feelings. This is a way to remain neutral on a subject, something being a good editor is all about.  Rob van  vee  19:48, 23 April 2020 (UTC)