User talk:Anakarylley

Welcome!
Hello, Anakarylley, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Karylle has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Blake Gripling (talk) 06:38, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Admin help request
I can't save the edit that i made in Karylle's wikipedia page
 * The page history shows that your edits were reverted. The reason given for the first reversion is "Rv crystallball/TBA appearance". The point is that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a fan-site, so it does not do rumours - the Verifiability policy requires a reliable, published source for anything added. That's probably the reason for the second reversion, too - Twitter is not considered a reliable source.


 * See WP:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle for how Wikipedia works: if you make a change and it is reverted, the next step is to discuss it on the article talk page and try to reach WP:Consensus with other users. But if an addition is reverted as unsourced, you need to be able to suggest a source. JohnCD (talk) 09:22, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

How to lock or protect a wikipedia page?
 * You can request page protection at WP:RFPP. There are two kinds: semi-protection, where a page can be edited only by "autoconfirmed" users (registered accounts at least 4 days old with at least 10 edits); and full protection, where pages can be edited only by administrators. But page protection will only be granted if there is vandalism going on, not to settle a content dispute by locking one version. JohnCD (talk) 09:27, 9 August 2016 (UTC)