User talk:Anamika Reddy

September 2014
Hello, I'm Amortias. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Kaaba without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Amortias (T)(C) 11:57, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014
Your recent editing history at Kaaba shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Dougweller (talk) 18:33, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sania Mirza with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 20:50, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Sangeeta Bijlani. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Abecedare (talk) 21:08, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Kaaba, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Kaaba was changed by Anamika Reddy (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.91565 on 2014-09-29T03:56:59+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:57, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

October 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Hagar has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Hagar was changed by Anamika Reddy (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861504 on 2014-10-07T05:12:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:12, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Muhammad ibn Abu Bakr. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. — ALittle Que nhi  ( talk to me ) 10:33, 12 October 2014 (UTC)