User talk:Ananagram

November 2013
Hello, I'm Some jerk on the Internet. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Christianity because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=580202990 here]. --some jerk on the Internet   (talk)  20:09, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
 * With that name, you're a dead cert for adminship.Ananagram (talk) 20:16, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot
Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Islam with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you.   &#127866;  Antiqueight  confer 00:22, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Same-sex marriage
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Also, defacing talk posts from other users, especially those attempting to help you, is considered in bad taste. - Brother Bulldog (talk) 23:35, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Batman, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Mel bourne Star ☆ talk 12:35, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Walter de Coutances with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. — Mel bourne Star ☆ talk 12:35, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Atheism are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. &mdash; Jess &middot; &Delta;&hearts; 03:04, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. &mdash; Jess &middot; &Delta;&hearts; 03:09, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for clearly not being here to edit constructively. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. John Reaves 03:42, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

On review, the block reason is insufficient for me being blocked. I demand an unblock or at least a valid reason for why I have been blocked, despite my many helpful edits.Ananagram (talk) 19:09, 4 December 2013 (UTC)''}}

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact the Arbitration Committee at . A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 16:35, 5 December 2013 (UTC)