User talk:Anandcte13

Welcome!
Hello, Anandcte13, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as List of Competitive Exam Coachings in udaipur, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! BethNaught (talk) 13:21, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Competitive Exam Coachings in udaipur


A tag has been placed on List of Competitive Exam Coachings in udaipur, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of https://www.facebook.com/notes/shiksha-sutra/list-of-competitive-exam-coachings-in-udaipur/1525616140986113. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BethNaught (talk) 13:21, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Shiksha Sutra Patrika


The article Shiksha Sutra Patrika has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No independent, reliable reference for it to meet WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 05:03, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Saraswati River
The report prepared by a seven-member committee headed by Prof KS Valdiya, eminent Geologist suggests that the Saraswati River was not mythical and it existed.

Highlights of the Report • The report is based on the study of the land texture of states of North-West India including- Rajasthan, Haryana and Punjab. • It is based on the account of the geological changes that had occurred in the past.

• The report is an assertion of the assumption that River Saraswati originated from Adibadri in Himalaya to culminate in the Arabian Sea through the Runn of Kutch.

• It was approximately 4000 km in length of which about 3000 kilometer fell in India while the remaining 1000 kilometer fell in present-day Pakistan.

• It had two branches, namely

a) Western Branch: It is represented by the Himalayan-born Satluj River of the past that flowed through the channels of present-day Ghaggar-Patialiwali rivulets.

b) Eastern Branch: Sarsuti and Markanda rivulets in Haryana represented the western branch of River, known as Tons-Yamuna.

• In the six-month research, the committee came across a Palaeo channel - a path abandoned by river when it changes its course – related to present Ghaggar, Sarsuti, Hakra and Nara Rivers.

• It suggested that nearly 1700 small and big villages and towns were located around the palaeo channel (during Harappa Civilisation).

Now, the report will be studied by the Central Ground Water Board as well as the Experts in Ministry of Water Resources for its optimum use. The report will be submitted before the Cabinet also for further action. Anandcte13 (talk) 09:23, 16 May 2021 (UTC)