User talk:Anas5555

Interpretive labels
Hi there, re: this, though you obviously meant well, we don't use interpretive labels like these in TV articles. See WP:ANTAGONIST, which is widely embraced by WikiProject television. If there were decent write-ups of each character and what their personalities were like, as we find at List of Millennium characters (which is what our goal is) then it would be obvious who the lead characters are and who the antagonists are, etc. Also, nobody needs to be told who the males and females are. Anyone who watches the series can figure out basic biological cues without being told. Thank you for understanding. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:30, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Thapki Pyar Ki have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 08:30, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sasural Simar Ka has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:16, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sasural Simar Ka was changed by Anas5555 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861628 on 2017-01-09T14:15:57+00:00.

Interpretive labels again
Hi there, re: this edit, the addition of interpretive labels like "Parallel Female Lead" is not particularly helpful. Unless you can source all of those labels they should be removed (and I have a feeling I'll be the one to do that.) I've previously attempted to discuss this with you, to no avail. Some of the labels that exist at that article are not only interpretive, but patently absurd. "Former Parallel Main Female Lead" is ridiculous and anyone who actually cares about that article, which I assume you do, should be embarrassed to see this printed there. Surely Indian TV viewers don't have a problem identifying males and females and wouldn't require an encyclopedia to spoon feed this information to them. Do you agree? Disagree? What's the difference between a lead role and a parallel lead role? Is a parallel lead role lesser than a lead role? If there were parallel leads, wouldn't all the lead cast be labeled the same way? Why do some people get labeled as "lead" and some as "parallel lead"? How does a parallel main lead differ from a main lead or a parallel lead? Is a parallel main lead higher up on the totem pole than a parallel lead? Isn't "main lead" redundant? If you are confused by these questions, I can only imagine how readers of that article will feel when they read that gibberish. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:25, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Tables for cast lists
Hi there, why did you convert the cast section at Saath Nibhaana Saathiya to tables? Tables are not the preferred format for cast lists. See WP:TVCAST. Tables prevent the inclusion of character descriptions as well as real-world content about character development, casting, etc. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, so we expect that these sections should be more than what IMDb tells us. Please familiarise yourself with our Manual of Style for Television and maybe take a look at quality articles, like List of Millennium characters, so you have a basis of comparison for what the article is supposed to look like. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:33, 17 June 2017 (UTC)