User talk:Anasofiarod

Welcome!
Hello, Anasofiarod, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 05:35, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Workplace communication has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:48, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Workplace communication was changed by Anasofiarod (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.85236 on 2016-08-02T01:48:07+00:00.


 * This looks like a false positive. I filed a report with the bot. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:01, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Feedback
Nice work on your draft. I made a few copy-edits to the page; you can see my rationale in the edit history. A few other changes you could make Thanks. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:11, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Although they were in the existing version of the page, those bolded bullet points aren't really the standard way to do sections in Wikipedia. It would improve your draft if you converted them to section headers, and tweaked the text accordingly.
 * 2) Cluebot (in the above section) reverted your edit because "learning how to treat others without offending them in any way" triggered its vandalism warning. I don't quite know why, but "in any way" might be a bit overstated - simply "without offending them" is adequate - it gets the point across without the additional words that might be interpreted by some people as sarcasm.
 * 3) The last reference, O'Conaill and Frohlich, has a DOI error. Please check the DOI and make sure it's correct.