User talk:Anastrophe/Archive 2016

My edits were not opinion, except when they were a response to other opinions. The vast majority of my edits were factual (certainly not "counterfactual" as your edits allege). You are removing a cited quote from Hitler himself that affirms his gun control policy and its motivations, as well as quotes from Gandhi and John Locke, who both agree that tyrants such as Hitler are should be removed from power, through force if necessary, which requires the exercise of the right to bear arms, while you and Hitler are both aware of this, and you realize that this is the primary reason why Hitler prohibited all members of the so-called "subject races", the non-Germanic, non-Aryan peoples, the vast majority of humanity, from bearing arms. You have no right to silence all dissent on the basis of your opinion that all views and facts that contradict your imaginary reading of history are "counterfactual" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tempus Loquendi (talk • contribs) 20:40, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Posts here will be archived after I read them.

ANEW
RE: Your comment that you may have broken 3RR at Nazi gun control theory: it did not appear so. You only had three reverts vs. the four needed for the rule to kick in. While most administrators would take in to consideration that the other editor's material was a bit beyond the pale, some are a little strict, so it may be a good idea to avoid further reverts there for 24 hours. Others seem to be watching. Kuru  (talk)  21:04, 19 July 2016 (UTC)