User talk:Anataelcabrera

Your submission at Articles for creation: LiquidO Detection has been accepted
 LiquidO Detection, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=LiquidO_Detection help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:23, 26 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much for approving the submission of the LiquidO Detection article - my first ever article in WIKI.
 * I'd like to raise your attention to the fact that the article has been proposed for deletion (a few days after approval) under some obscure grounds to me (despite reading through and trying to understand). I found the approach of some wiki-experts far from the welcoming framework I thought wiki was about, specially for professional scientists (i.e. knowledge generators) when intending to support the community along many others. So, I'd like to kindly ask your support to help us resolve the situation, which may have been somewhat accentuated by the fast approval of the article (faster than ever expected for sure). I am open for any constructive approach to move forward within the WIKI guidelines. I mean nothing but to find solution(s) to move forward and support this commendable project. Thanks so much in advance. Anatael Cabrera (talk) 20:19, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest Notice
Hello, Anataelcabrera. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page LiquidO Detection, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

Nomination of LiquidO Detection for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article LiquidO Detection is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/LiquidO Detection until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PianoDan (talk) 17:02, 28 March 2022 (UTC)