User talk:Anatomyczar

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Anatomyczar some links above may be helpful. I'll take a look at what you've been editing and see if I can help. cheers, Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:22, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:33, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia from the Anatomy Wikiproject!
Welcome to Wikipedia from WikiProject Anatomy! We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of anatomy articles here on Wikipedia. One of our members has noticed that you are involved in editing anatomy articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, a few things that may be relevant to editing wikipedia articles are:
 * Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
 * You will make a big difference to the quality of information by adding reliable sources. Sourcing anatomy articles is essential and makes a big difference to the quality of articles. And, while you're at it, why not use a book to source information, which can source multiple articles at once!
 * We try and use a standard way of arranging the content in each article. That layout is here. These headings let us have a standard way of presenting the information in anatomical articles, indicate what information may have been forgotten, and save angst when trying to decide how to organise an article. That said, this might not suit every article. If in doubt, be bold!
 * We write for a general audience. Every reader should be able to understand anatomical articles, so when possible please write in a simple form -- most readers do not understand anatomical jargon. See this essay for more details.

Feel free to contact us on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. I wish you all the best on your wiki-voyages!


 * I know strictly that you've already signed up and introduced yourself, but this message has some decent links that are important when getting started. Best, -- CFCF  🍌 (email) 21:24, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

RE: references
Hi Joel. I just added to the section where the references should be and removed the banner for you. I will get back to you soon when I have some spare time and explain in more details. In the mean time; if you click on "View history" and compare your last edit and mine you can see what changes I made to the syntax. I also added the article to my watchlist and will keep an eye on it for some time and do some minor edits and help out a bit. Kind regards JakobSteenberg (talk) 14:47, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi, again. Good to hear that you now know how to make references. As you might can see on the article I also removed the "jargon template". The article does not have to be more "easy-read" than it is now; and generally speaking you do not have in any way describe what or where the e.g. the humerus is on such an article if you only link to it. I could not see if you had made any links on the article. If you do not know how to it is very simple: humerus links to humerus, if you want the link text to say something else than the article title; you write Medial epicondyle then the reader will only see a link saying medial epicondyle but it directs them to the right one.
 * By the way I also added a infobox to the article and I have not filled it out yet. We have a couple of different infoboxes but we do not have one for tendons so in this case I used the one for muscles. They are however all similar in design. There are some predefined parameters in the e.g. origin and insertion and you just "fill out the box" by writing the after the =-sign (It is all ways best to use a lot of links in the infobox). If you do not fill the parameters out they will not be shown so do not bother looking for e.g. MeshNumbers if you do not want to. Most, if not all, of our infoboxes can be found at WikiProject Anatomy/Templates and it is only the infoboxes that need filling out. JakobSteenberg (talk) 17:41, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

RE: please send example
Thank you. If you try to search for common flexor tendons (with the S at the end) you will get the search page since no such page exist yet. You will however see this text: "You may create the page "Common flexor tendons", but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered." If you click on the red link you will create the article and if you insert this code: #REDIRECT Common flexor tendon the next time you search for the plural form Wikipedia will send you directly to the singular form (the real article). This is a redirect. There are tons of these on wikipedia for abbreviations, misspellings and everything else. An example; if you search for Obama you will be send to the article Barack Obama (notice the text on the very top: " (Redirected from Obama)"). What I am talking about with tagging the articles with WP:Anatomy banner is inserting another template on the REDIRECTS talk page. If you look at Talk:Common flexor tendon you can see a WP:Anatomy banner. If you look at the code (just like the articles, just press "edit") it will look like this. There are 3 parameters here; class, importance and field. Class is the quality of the article but there are also a class for things that fall out of this category these are "redirect", "list" and others. These two examples does not requires rating on the importance scale as well. Field is to subdivide our articles into animal, embryo, gross, meta, micro, NA, neuro, organs, systems. ...by the way if you want to have some of these often used codes close to hand: When you edit an article you can see a drop-down menu between the edit window (where you write) and the edit summary. Try changing from "Insert" to "Wiki markup" then you can just click on the most used syntaxes. I know it is not easy to start editing Wikipedia but learning curve is step and after 10-20 edits people often know 90 % of what they normally will need. Thanks for your respond JakobSteenberg (talk) 22:09, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Infobox
To switch the image in the infobox find the parameter called image after the = is the name of the current image. Delete the name and insert the name of the new image. Have you found an image on Commons? ...Commons is Wikipedias image database. If you want to use an image on Wikipedia it has to be located here... if you have a good image and own the rights to it you can upload it to Commons. Have a look at Commons webpage. If you want to change the imagetext in the article find the parameter in the infobox called caption and change the text after the =. Remeber t

Template
The "upper limb muscle templates" "insertion code" is you if you want to edit the template you can search for template:Upper limb general or click on on the V in the upper left corner of it. Then you get to the "template-site" and you can just press edit and make the changes. On this side (template:Upper limb general) the template is just a table and can be edited just as tables in any article. But if I was you I would stay far far from this at the moment since this is more code heavy.


 * I hope this helps to clarify, but just try to make a change and see what happens when you click Show preview. If you end up saving it and you make a mess of things I have the article on my watchpage and will fix it for you when I get the time.
 * Infinite seems to describe the scope of the project. We have about 5000 articles about anatomy plus about the same number in templates, redirects and other things and are at most 50 people (20 is a better guess) who edit them.

If you are looking for something to work on
Hi. Good to see that you figured out how to insert the image... If you are looking for something to do besides common extensor tendon you could take a look at gluteal muscles. The article might be a good one for you since it is only start class at the moment (our second lowest rating), references in the article are sparse, the article already have a couple of sections that could easily be expanded and contrary to common flexor and extensor tendon it is much more heavy on text at the moment and generally easier to write about. We have some okay articles on gluteus maximus, gluteus medius and gluteus minimus but gluteal muscles are below their standard. In regards to images I know there are plenty on commons. ...I it is just a suggestion but I stumbled across the article and thought it might be a good place for you to start. JakobSteenberg (talk) 22:06, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi, again.
 * What you are describing is called a disambiguation page you can see and example at abductor pollicis muscle. This is one way to go. However with an article such as gluteal muscles it is normally preferred (especially when an article already exist) to simply write about three separate encyclopedia subjects (gluteus maximus, gluteus medius and gluteus minimus) in one article. There are generally to ways to go about this:
 * A textbook approach where you write about the all three muscles as a whole; start with a lead and the following subheadings could be; attachments, function, innervation and so on. Here you more or less write about the three muscles as one subject and point out differences where needed.
 * You could make/or keep the lead and subdivide the article into the subheadings gluteus maximus, medius and minimus where each of the three articles are reduced in text to give the reader an overview; lets say 10 lines for each.
 * The first approaches would be my first choice when possible. If there is some information which you think is not relevant to the muscles fell free to remove it, but it would be best to see if it is already described under buttocks subheading anatomy with covers the gluteal region (at least gluteal region redirects here).
 * ...or a gluteal region could be turned into a proper anatomy article and we could link to it from buttocks. JakobSteenberg (talk) 12:43, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

RE:article for Clinical Anatomy
Hi. I have send you an e-mail. Kind regards JakobSteenberg (talk) 15:16, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Please sign your talk page messages
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Talk:Cranial nerves, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 14:01, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

optic nerve
Thanks for the explanation. It seems that the technical terminology and the consensus terminology of gross anatomists are in conflict. The last paragraph in the cranial nerve lead seems clear (to me at least) at the moment. Biolprof (talk) 18:34, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Cranial nerves and WP:Verifiability
Cranial nerves is a "Good article" WP:GA and to keep it at this standard we should try and ensure all edits are well-sourced. This means that all parts of the article should have a source. If a source is a book it needs a page number or range when it's used -- otherwise it's very unfair and difficult to "verify" because an editor will have to sift through the entire book. And can you please not remove good sources unless you're replacing them (eg ). --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:22, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Replacing reliable sources with your book
On further investigation I can't help but notice you've been making minor copyedits and replacing a number of reliable sources, including widely respected textbooks, with a book of your authorship: We welcome all editors but we also have conflict of interest guidelines here. It may be worthwhile for you to read those and in future edits to add content, rather than replace existing sources with your own, particularly if you plan on advertising it to other users. I'll be happy to help out if there are any problems. Cheers, --Tom (LT) (talk) 03:19, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
 * 1)
 * 2)
 * 3)
 * 4)
 * 5)
 * 6)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:14, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
Hello, I'm IronGargoyle. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Cranial nerves with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:18, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Removal of content again
If some sections have some worth and convey some value to readers (eg the development section) please do not remove it as you have done. Wikipedia is a collaborative endeavour and the idea is that other users will improve on content as it goes along. By completely removing content we go from a section that is (let's say) 20% useful to 0%.--Tom (LT) (talk) 01:41, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Recent edit to Cranial nerves
Hi there, I noticed that you removed some content from Cranial nerves without explaining why. I see you are a seasoned editor, so please can you give a summary of changes for other editors, or it will be picked up via various anti-vandal tools. If you continue to remove content without saying why, it will certainly be viewed as unconstructive vandalism, but I'm sure that's not the case.If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Mediavalia talk 15:02, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Response to recent edit to Cranial nerves
Hi again. Yes, I can see from the contributions you have made that you're obviously an expert and we are clearly benefiting hugely from your wealth of experience on this subject. However, as I stated before, please be mindful of the way you edit articles: blanking large amounts of content without edit summary and reference to discussion with other editors (which I see you've done a lot of) will always result in a rollback from those of us patrolling Wikipedia for vandalism as it will be flagged in our various tools. Thanks and happy editing! Mediavalia talk 16:20, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
 * AnatomyCzar is a relatively new but very valued editor. AnatomyCzar, there is a small box at the bottom you can fill in when you make an edit, where you can write a short summary of each edit (see Help:Edit summary). That summary will display when a user views an article's history, and helps other editors keep track of changes made to the article over time, and understand the logic of different edits. Cheers, --Tom (LT) (talk) 01:35, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Indeed, I can see that. Thanks a lot, Tom. Cheers, Mediavalia  talk 12:38, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cranial nerves, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ptosis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your continued edits
Thanks very much and for your continuing edits -- and if you'd be so kind as to include a chapter name in the book reference it will make life much easier for future users. --Tom (LT) (talk) 01:19, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Good articles and featured articles
Last note while I'm here.

I'll briefly tell you about article ratings and what the terms "good article" and "featured article" mean.
 * All articles are given a rating by editors on their talk pages. The ratings go from stub (short undeveloped article) to start-class, C, B, good article ("GA") and featured article ("FA").
 * The ratings are given by editors based on a scale, but are somewhat arbitrary and don't have much meaning, except for GA and FA. To get these two ratings, an article first undergoes a review.
 * A good article (WP:GA) is an article that is reviewed by a single user. It has a green star in the corner and "GA" status on the talk page (such as Cranial nerves). The reviewer may or may not by a subject expert. The reviewer users six criteria (WP:GA?) to determine if an article can be promoted. Often this comes down to making sure the prose is well-written and everything in the article has a source. An article has to be broad but does not have to completely cover a subject in all areas to become a GA. When requesting a GA, an article can take some months to receive a review, and during a review the nominator has time to respond to suggestions by the reviewer.
 * A featured article (WP:FA) is a good article that undergoes an intense peer review by many users. These articles require a lot of discussion and are given a lot of scrutiny. Such articles are considered Wikipedia's best work and must be comprehensive. These articles are often featured on our main page, and have a star that says "featured article" on them (eg Cerebellum).
 * Many articles have changed since the reviews, as they are edited and improved.

There are currently 15 "good" anatomical articles and 4 "featured" anatomical articles (WikiProject_Anatomy). I hope to expand this in the future. I hope this short introduction is useful, it is something that crops up in many Wikipedia discussions. Kindly, --Tom (LT) (talk) 01:34, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Anatomy Newsletter #4
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:25, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Anatomy newsletter #5
Message delivered on behalf of WikiProject Anatomy by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:21, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Inactive WikiProject Anatomy participant
Hi Anatomyczar, you're receiving this message because you were previously listed at WikiProject Anatomy as a participant, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 years.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the participant list, so that we stop spamming you with newsletters and have a better idea of who to contact for active discussions. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting here when you become active again.

Thank you, and all the best on your WikiVoyages! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 18:02, 29 March 2021 (UTC)