User talk:Ande2144

Dinglefut Din-Dingley
A tag has been placed on Dinglefut Din-Dingley, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. justinfr (talk) 20:35, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Dinglefut Din-Dingley Responds!
I bitterly contest your decision to mark my page for deletion. Please state the grounds on which you suggest Dinglefut Din-Dingley has "no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent?" I suggest you re-read the criteria. Please note the use of the conjection "and" in the criteria. This requires the text to be unsalvageably incoherent in addition to the content being meaningless. Assuming arguendo the content was meaningless, the text was well written, well styled and easily readable. I suggest you reconsider your decision. Thank you for your interest in Dinglefut. Ande2144 (talk) 21:18, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. See WP:HOAX. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:36, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

I don't think you know what you're talking about. Are you suggesting Dinglefut Din-Dingley is a hoax? I highly doubt that. And, do you have any proof? If you suggest that the account is disputed, please note so in the article. Ande2144 (talk) 21:40, 13 August 2008 (UTC)


 * You have it backwards. It's your job to supply reliable independent sources showing that your subject exists and is notable.  See WP:V and WP:BIO.  If you don't have such sources, stop wasting our time.  NawlinWiki (talk) 21:43, 13 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Well, why don't you give him/her 30 seconds to come up with the sources. Do you expect all articles to be "main page ready" within two minutes of creation?  75.73.35.148 (talk) 00:08, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of WikiDick
Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TheLetterM (talk) 21:22, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

July 2010
You have been indefinitely blocked from editing for '''It's clear from your sorry edit history and most recently your edit to User talk:NawlinWiki‎ that you are not here to help build an encyclopedia, and have neither the stamina nor the attitude to fit in here. Accordingly, you are blocked indefinitely.'''. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Rodhull andemu  23:20, 7 July 2010 (UTC)