User talk:AndeanThunder~enwiki

Fíjese, Marecelito. Con lo de "terrorista", hace un grave error en contra de las normas de WP:NPOV. La mera neta es que el sí era operativo de la CIA. Terrorista es una opinión nomás. Sí quiere debatirlo conmigo, invito que vaya a la página más indicada para hacerlo. Cambiarlo otra vez sin hacerlo no es opción. Saludos,--Die4Dixie (talk) 18:17, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Falkland Islands Article in Arbitration
Having briefly reviewed the article's discussion history, I've identified you as a potentially aggrieved editor whose contributions may have been negatively impacted by the actions of a group of editors who are alleged to be POV-pushing and engaging in WP:GAMES. I invite you to peruse the arbcom request and voice your opinion and experiences, at your leisure. The link is:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#WP:NPOV_and_WP:GAMES_in_.22Falkland_Islands.22_and_related_articles

Thank you.Alex79818 (talk) 22:24, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

3RR
Your personal opinion of Henry Morgan is not the basis for changing the article. Please read and digest 3RR, you risk being blocked for edit warring. Justin talk 15:31, 17 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Andean Thunder, you're wrong about Panama anyway. Panama belonged to Spain, i.e. the enemy. However, even if this were an act of piracy, he spent the rest of his career as a privateer, so calling him a "privateer" at the beginning of the article is much more appropriate.(Huey45 (talk) 00:07, 18 May 2010 (UTC))

AN/I Notice
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Kelper is usually considered a racist epithet these days, so I have raised your edit at ANI. Justin talk 15:35, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Timeline of the history of the Falkland Islands. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Pfainuk talk 17:06, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

I've raised your disruptive edits at the NPOV noticeboard. Justin talk 23:57, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

I will give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you were simply ignorant, however, the term Kelpers has been used by Argentines as a racist pejorative and it is considered highly offensive when used in that context. Nor do you have to be coloured to be the victim of racism, don't make that pretence as you insult my intelligence.

I don't "censor" articles, so please don't play the martyr, your previous edits at Henry Morgan showed me you're well aware of POV policy and choose to ignore it. I do respect the NPOV policy and some of the edits I will be changing were made by the Pro-British side. Justin talk 00:48, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

You have now broken WP:3RR on Timeline of the history of the Falkland Islands, and I have reported this here. Pfainuk talk 07:12, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Blocked
 You have been blocked for edit-warring on Timeline of the history of the Falkland Islands. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator. For alternative methods to appeal, see Appealing a block. --  tariq abjotu  07:23, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

IP edit adding material this user was
An IP 79.41.56.64 has just made the same addition to the article. I have reverted the change, i am not sure if that is block evasion or someone else, just thought id let people know. BritishWatcher (talk) 20:38, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Just in case you didn't know (I don't think you do, according to your page, you don't have the slightest knowledge of foreign languages) I wrote about your deleting my edits in the Spanish language version of Wikipedia, in the Malvinas discusion page. User Jcestepario said he would include this sentence for me, but without the phrase "tacitly admittting that the islands were once Argentine" (the author's own words, not mine). Evidently, you don't like it that way either.


 * So before you start threatening me, I suggest you do a little reaserch. Look around in other wikipedias before accusing, please. (On second thought, don't bother, I suspect you hate foreign languages too). --AndeanThunder (talk) 21:43, 7 August 2010 (UTC)


 * English is the only language i need or want to know thank you. You wrote about this over on the Spanish wikipedia did you? I hope that does not mean you have been encouraging other editors from there to come to the English language wikipedia and influence debate here.


 * I have not started to threaten you, i have simply pointed out to people here an addition to the article you were blocked for edit warring on was made by an IP. I do not know if that was you or not, perhaps you could tell us? BritishWatcher (talk) 21:59, 7 August 2010 (UTC)


 * "English is the only language I need or want to know thank you." Thanks for confirming what I suspected. Maybe your narrow-mindedness also prevents you from realising that what I meant by writing about this incident in the Spanish language Wikipedia is that I consider my edits to be legitimate. User Jcestepario thinks that I should have softened the language as regards the 1999 event, you know, Chile suspending flights, but he totally agrees with me that the 1940 entry at the Index of Foreign Office files should be included in the article, as it is well referenced. All I did is ask other wikipedia editors with a knowledge of English to continue backing the changes, not edit warring.


 * And no, it wasn't me who added that sentence to the article, so forget about that.


 * Also, I couldn't help but notice that huge, enormous British flag in your page. not that I dislike ultranationalists, as every one should love their country, but I became a little interested in the kind of edits you do. I noticed that, in the Republic of Ireland Talkpage, you wrote the following:
 * "The Republic of Ireland is not a republic??? Has anyone told Republicans in Northern Ireland this?"
 * I think that tells A LOT, A WHOLE LOT about you and your views. I can only imagine what you write about in articles related to Northern Ireland. So much for your neutrality. And I also noticed this:
 * "Considering you were WP:Canvassed by a blocked editor here, i can not support any inclusion supported by that blocked editor at this time. BritishWatcher (talk) 00:46, 8 August 2010 (UTC)"
 * I suspect at this time actually means forever, am I right? Because you're not going to let that sentence be included in the article at any time, in any form, even it is well referenced, well sourced, etc. am I right?
 * To me, this is a clear case of censorship. A Google search of the phrase Proposed offer by HMG to reunite Falkland Islands to Argentina and acceptance of lease yields two results, from two different authors, both of them British, yet you don't allow it to be included in the article.


 * You know what? I'm going to ask an administrator from a non-English speaking country and a non Spanish-speaking country to solve this dispute, as you, Justin and all the other editors seem to be determined to keep the article in its present form, no matter what. Kind regards--AndeanThunder (talk) 02:31, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

User has made comments on the Spanish Wikipedia asking for help
This user has raised the matter he was blocked for edit warring on over at the Spanish wikipedia asking for help. Could an admin or spanish speaker check what exactly he "asked" them to do to help him? BritishWatcher (talk) 22:07, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
 * An editor from the spanish wikipedia that responded to this blocked editors request for help has reverted my reversion of the IP edit mentioned above. .  BritishWatcher (talk) 23:06, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

ANI Notice
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Tb hotch Ta lk C. 22:26, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Block extended
As you have engaged in canvassing to recruit editors while blocked, your block now lasts until 9 August 2010 at 10:28 am. Fences &amp;  Windows  02:32, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

December 2010
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tbhotch ™ © Happy New Year 06:50, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh and "IT'S ALWAYS THE SAME FRIKKIN PEOPLE" is a personal attack, believe it or not, you like it or not. Stop helping sockpuppeteers Tbhotch ™ © Happy New Year 06:52, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

You have been reported to WP:AN3 for edit warring here. Pfainuk talk 10:38, 29 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Something else worth mentioning: I notice this post of yours. Now, it's not appropriate anyway, because it is not discussing an improvement to the article.  But I would also like to point out that, per WP:TPG, you should always use English on the English Wikipedia.  If you must use another language, you should provide a translation into English, and if you are unable to do so you should find somebody who is - possibly through Embassy. Pfainuk talk 10:49, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

About your handling of the Falkland Islands talkpage discussion
Do not give anyone reasons to banish you, or your comments. Behave stritcly according to the rules (write English, discuss the topic and don't do any personal references, assume good faith, don't do anything that could be considered an attack on someone. Otherwise, you know you'll be treated with severity but those who oppose your stance and are deeply involved in the subject. Salut, --IANVS (talk) 06:51, 29 December 2010 (UTC)


 * I've removed this from the talk page to comply with WP policy (WP:NOTAFORUM, English languge) . If you want to discuss, do it properly and in cold blood. Salut, --IANVS (talk) 06:54, 29 December 2010 (UTC)


 * A quien quiera que sea el usuario 66.177.19.78, no vale la pena gastarse por estos tipos. Todo el tiempo hablan de "consenso", que "consenso" esto, que "consenso" aquello, que primero hay que lograr "consenso" en la página de discusión, etc. cuando lo que realmente hacen es aprobar o reprobar una adición, según el punto de vista británico. Si este artículo fuera realmente neutral, en el verdadero sentido de la palabra neutral, deberían haber varios editores, que no sean ni británicos ni argentinos, haciendo cambios, lo cual nunca ocurrirá, ya que los editores británicos se consideran dueños y señores de esta página. Saludos --AndeanThunder (talk) 01:48, 29 December 2010 (UTC)


 * In your, place, insted of cointuing an edit war I would re-write the stance without anything that can be seen as a personal attack or a violation of AGF, and sticking strictly to the point. The way others editor do behave can be further debated afterwards... by then, you better be aware of the WP policies that may apply to the case. Salut, --IANVS (talk) 07:00, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit-warring at Talk:Falkland Islands. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Black Kite (t) (c) 16:27, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

RE: Tucuman, not Santiago
Hi AndeanThunder, I see I made a mistake with the picture. It clearly is San Miguel de Tucumán. Thank you!, --Bleff (talk) 21:51, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called AndeanThunder. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name AndeanThunder~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 21:53, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 10:27, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)