User talk:Anderch

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Gasta220 (talk) 21:53, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

2009 Super League season results
Hi. As outlined on my talkpage both here and here, please refrain from publishing fixtures on this page. For one, the page is a results page, not a fixture list, and secondly (and far more importantly), the fixtures are copyright of Super League Europe, and we don't have permission to display them on Wikipedia. Thanks Julianhall (talk) 11:18, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

GA reassessment of Melbourne Storm
I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. You are being notified as you have made a number of contributions to the article. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:Melbourne Storm/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:19, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited 2012 Melbourne Storm season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gold Coast and Balmain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 5
Hi. When you recently edited 2012 Melbourne Storm season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Penrith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 12
Hi. When you recently edited 2012 Melbourne Storm season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Greenfield (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Thank you!Anderch (talk) 23:34, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

United States Grand Prix
Please do not add "Not Helds" to Grand Prix articles until a race is held. The Not Helds are used to indicate gaps between races, and there will not be a gap in the USGP history until the 2012 race takes place. Otherwise you would have a case where like the Ducth Grand Prix, defunct since 1985, would have its "Not Held" bumped up incrementally each year for no actual purpose. --Falcadore (talk) 02:02, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Melbourne Storm titles
With regards to the following diff, the reason for the edit is listing premierships with an asterisk and footnote presents a misleading representation of the truth. The implication of an asterisk is that there is an existing and valid title with a caveat attached to it, when in reality it is a non-existent title with some history behind it. By valid analogy, it would be the equivalent of listing Alberto Contador with an asterisk as the winner of the 2010 Tour de France in List of Tour de France winners, or listing "2010 Tour de France" with an asterisk in the infobox in Alberto Contador.

Your comment that "Everyone knows they were stripped" holds no weight. Only people familiar with the subject matter know that the titles were stripped. Wikipedia must be written to an audience of people who are both familiar and unfamiliar with the subject matter.

I have returned the presentation of that information to the way I proposed it. I see valid alternatives as being showing the dates with a strikethrough to make a stronger statement that those titles are not considered valid, or to not show the stripped titles at all as per the infobox; but, my preference is for my edit because the meaning is unambiguous. Aspirex (talk) 06:57, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

October 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=578477179 your edit] to 2014 Melbourne Storm season may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:11, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=578477636 your edit] to 2014 Melbourne Storm season may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:14, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

February 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=596836879 your edit] to Fat Tony & Co. may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:30, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
 * }

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

References in the 2016 Melbourne Storm Season Article
Hi Anderch,

I have slowly been progressing through the references in the 2016 Melbourne Storm season, ensuring that the sourced material are using the correct templates and are filled in correctly (I still have a few references to update). I see that you are the main contributor to the article and thought I would communicate with you directly as to what I have done and why so that you can use these measures in your future edits. When referencing a source it is important to use the correct template. You can find examples of all possible templates here. For example, you have referenced the NRL website using the news template when in fact you should have used the web template. In addition, when referencing you should include the accessdate field (which not only includes the month and year of access but also the day), and where ever possible also the date the webpage was created. Also, when you have multiple information which is covered a single reference rather than insert the same reference multiple times, instead use a ref name in your reference so that you can cite the one reference as many times as you like. Have a look at the references I have so far edited in the article for examples of what I am referring.

Hope this information helps and if you have any queries don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page.

Thanks for your contributions and keep up the good work,

Forbesy 777 (talk) 02:12, 9 March 2016 (UTC)


 * I have just been notified you reverted one of my edits and removed one of my others in your recent edits to the page and so I wanted to communicate with you directly as to why I have gone reverted them back to mine. Wikipedia requires everything to be verifiable - and as such everything that is written should be accompanied by a reliable reference. When you added additional details to the Season Summary section regarding Billy Slater's injury you removed my reference and added a new one. Now although it is great that you added a reference for the Slater injury details, there is nothing in that reference as to the details listed prior to that (i.e. Storm's victory over the Dragons and Marika's 50th game). As such, both references are required. Secondly, the NRL.com website is not a newspaper or equivalent. As such, when referencing it you should use the website reference template and not the news template. Thanks, Forbesy 777 (talk) 23:56, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Nrl2011Finalsseries
Template:Nrl2011Finalsseries has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 16:47, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Melbourne Storm
The nomination for this does not appear to be listed at Featured article candidates.--Grahame (talk) 02:44, 13 August 2017 (UTC) Added nowAnderch (talk) 00:51, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thank you massively for updating the tables for the Melbourne Storm page! The GRVO fLig htn ing (talk) 00:37, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Anderch. Thank you for creating 2023 Melbourne Storm season. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;    (contact)   21:18, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)