User talk:Anders Grubb

Your submission at Articles for creation: Krympt-por-syndrom (July 28)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spicy was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Krympt-por-syndrom and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Krympt-por-syndrom, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Krympt-por-syndrom Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Spicy&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Krympt-por-syndrom reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spicy (talk) 13:16, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Shrunken pore syndrome
Hi, Anders Grubb. I wanted to leave you some notes about various policies and guidelines on the English Wikipedia, as it can be trying for scientists and researchers accustomed to journal publications to adapt to the procedures here for encyclopedic medical content, which is a bit different than journal publishing. First, you may want to review Conflict of interest (COI) regarding what contributions you can make and how you should make them. Next, the guidelines for sourcing of medical content on the English Wikipedia are at WP:MEDRS; there are only rare circumstances when primary sources should be cited, and content should rely mostly on secondary reviews. Also, we can't put sources together to draw conclusions that aren't explictly stated in the sources; that is referred to as synthesis on Wikipedia. We can only publish conclusions already drawn by secondary review sources. I have left commentary at Talk:Shrunken pore syndrome about things to address in the article to make it compliant with Wikipedia policies and guidelines. I suspect that some of the content can be sourced correctly, just hasn't yet been because you were not aware that content needs to be cited to secondary reviews only. Your feedback at the article talk page will help others correct the issues in the article, even if a COI prevents you from doing so. Best regards, Sandy Georgia (Talk)  19:00, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Thank you SandyGeorgia! Anders Grubb