User talk:Anders Hjorth-Jørgensen

Stop marking major edits as minor
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Freddy Milton, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you.

Hello, I'm J. M.. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Freddy Milton, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. &mdash;J. M. (talk) 20:12, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Please stop
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. &mdash;J. M. (talk) 21:35, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

March 2018
Your recent editing history at Freddy Milton shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 331dot (talk) 11:52, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Take a deep breath…
It is great that you want to improve the article on Freddy Milton. However, we have a number of policies, including a policy on sourcing, which must be followed.

I urge you to check in at our Teahouse where experienced editors will be happy to help you.

Teahouse/Questions

-- S Philbrick (Talk)  13:36, 20 March 2018 (UTC)