User talk:Andersankarlid

Your submission at Articles for creation: A good company (August 14)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:A good company and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:A good company, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:A_good_company Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:A_good_company reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 12:12, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
Hello, I'm Julietdeltalima. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sustainable fashion have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  18:23, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello Andersankarlid. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Sustainable fashion, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Andersankarlid. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. ''This company isn't notable by Wikipedia standards and you only appear to have shown up here to mention it in articles. That isn't okay. Please read our community guidelines regarding conflicts of interest, reliable sources, and inline linking to external commercial websites. If you have further questions, you'll get answers much more quickly and comprehensively at WP:TEAHOUSE than from me (we are all volunteers here). Thanks. But please don't co-opt Wikipedia into a "native advertising" platform; that is not okay.  Julietdeltalima   (talk) '' 18:26, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Stone paper. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. ''Irrespective of the clear promotional nature of your edits (which are obviously intended to gain visibility for a non-notable company with which you appear to have a conflict of interest), why are all of these random words capitalized? Please read MOS:CAPS. Thanks.  Julietdeltalima   (talk) '' 18:29, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. GermanJoe (talk) 18:11, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Editing with a conflict of interest - please use article talk for edit requests
Hello Andersankarlid, thank you for the COI disclosure on your userpage. But you should also avoid editing affected mainspace articles directly, especially with promotional content and link spam to your company website. Please suggest all content changes relating to your company or its products on the articles' respective talkpages instead of editing such articles yourself (see WP:COI for more details about so-called edit requests). Please also note that content should generally be based on independent reliable sources, not on commercial PR websites. GermanJoe (talk) 18:16, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:A good company
Hello, Andersankarlid. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:A good company, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:03, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:A good company


Hello, Andersankarlid. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "A good company".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 10:59, 16 May 2021 (UTC)