User talk:Andersdotter

ISG edits
How should people interpret your last edit of the International School of Gemology article? As part of the controversy? I don't see a problem with James promoting his mates on his own forum. Rock-o-solid (talk) 14:31, 12 June 2012 (UTC) It appears to be a conflict of interest to publicly attack one company yet the one your are partnererd up with is pushed. I could just remove this from the wiki, i just found it odd kindest regards andersdotter

=References==Please use high quality references per WP:MEDRS such as review articles or major textbooks. Note that review articles are NOT the same as peer reviewed articles. Thanks and welcome to Wikipedia. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:23, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

June 2012
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. v/r - TP 14:31, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Registered Gemologist


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Registered Gemologist requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. TheLongTone (talk) 16:39, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of World Gem Society for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article World Gem Society is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/World Gem Society until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Peridon (talk) 19:52, 25 December 2012 (UTC)