User talk:Anderthought

For (at least) the second time, your addition to Simulation hypothesis entitled "COMMON EVIDENCE AGAINST SIMULATION THEORY" has been reverted. I know you're adding this in good faith - but once something you add gets reverted by an established editor, you should go to the "Discussion" tab for that page and discuss the matter there before re-inserting it.

In this case, the reason for revertion is that:


 * 1) What you're posting doesn't sound encyclopeadic.
 * 2) It has zero references.
 * 3) It looks an awful lot like "original research" (ie, something you thought up yourself), which is not allowed on Wikipedia no matter how good or well-thought-out it is.
 * 4) It is incorrectly formatted (which by itself wouldn't be a problem - we'd just fix it for you - but added to all of the other things, it's just another nail in the coffin).

I'd be happy to discuss this further on the Talk:Simulation hypothesis page - but please don't re-insert this piece again without prior community consensus - because any of half a dozen people will instantly swoop down and remove it again - and much ill will would result from that.

SteveBaker (talk) 16:48, 15 October 2010 (UTC)