User talk:Andhraite

September 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please do not remove contents with reference by replacing them with non NPOV content, please have a go through WP:Ref and WP:NPOV trakesht (talk) 14:45, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

All the references for the statements have been added. And referencing a biased site like telugudesam.org is not a valid source. Andhraite (talk) 18:36, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Ccrashh (talk) 00:47, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

If you do not want to accept facts and keep Vandalizing my post, you will be banned from Wikipedia. Andhraite (talk) 19:49, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

I thought Wikipedia is a source to have the detailed information with relevant sources attached. If you can't tolerate that, well, goodluck. I have more references that I can provide from legitimate sources that depict the true nature of this guy with relevant facts. I will keep editing this until you educate yourself.Andhraite (talk) 19:54, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Ccrashh (talk) 01:03, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

I would strongly suggest you review this site's neutrality policy before adding such strongly worded language. This sort of edit is not allowed under any circumstances. PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:41, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe our core policies. utcursch | talk 05:53, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

If your view is to have a neutral info about anyone, I suggest you edit the original entry to reflect Neutrality. The original entry seems to have been written by someone who is fan of this guy. The guy who said last warning, can shove it. If you can't talk in civil way, this would be my response.Andhraite (talk) 16:50, 24 September 2009 (UTC)


 * I believe you have been warned before, either through this talk page, or through the comments added to reverts of your edits. The strongly worded language you are using is not in line with Wikipedia policy.  As PMDrive1061 suggested, please view WP:NPOV to see why your posts are being reverted.  The "language" used in the warnings are automated through a tool called Twinkle.  As for me, I have never heard of N. Chandrababu Naidu before I began to clean up one particular user's poor edits.  This article has remained on my watchlist since then.  Naidu may be a "backstabber" and/or a "turncoat" as you say, but Wikipedia policy prohibits that kind of language for an article. Ccrashh (talk) 17:12, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Thank you for contributing to our encyclopedia. However, some of your recent edits appear to be removing sourced material from N. Chandrababu Naidu, and by battling with others to restore your preferred edits you are running into problems with some of our site editing policies. We call such tit-for-tat content replacement "edit warring", and this can lead to your account being temporarily blocked. If you have concerns about the article content, the best thing to do is take them up on the article talkpage with other editors, and be sure to provide reliable sources for your suggestions. If you can't reach a mutual agreement, our dispute resolution page has some useful suggestions. I hope this helps - and please be careful to avoid edit warring in future. You may also like to review our biographical articles policy; negative information about the article subject must be scrupulously sourced, and neutrally written, or it can be removed on sight. All the best, EyeSerene talk 17:10, 24 September 2009 (UTC)