User talk:Andhw

Welcome!
Hi, Andhw. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Hdjensofjfnen (Can I get a connection? Alternatively, trout me.) 19:47, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

California Birth Index
The California Birth Index is not a reliable source. Please stop using it in biographies of living persons. Primefac (talk) 19:49, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

WP:BLP policy violations
Once again, I urge you to stop using California Birth Index as a source in articles. As a birth index, it fails both of the following criteria:


 * (from WP:BLPPRIMARY): Do use public records that include personal details, such as date of birth, home value, traffic citations, vehicle registrations, and home or business addresses.
 * (from WP:BLPPRIVACY): Wikipedia includes full names and dates of birth that have been widely published by reliable sources, or by sources linked to the subject such that it may reasonably be inferred that the subject does not object to the details being made public.

Ionmars10 (talk) 17:11, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Alert
Kevin ( aka L235 · t · c) 17:49, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

BLP violations, again
I understand that you're editing in good faith, but I urge you to PLEASE take some time to read over the biographies of living persons policy; you must be careful to respect the subject's privacy by only reporting personal info that has been widely published, and not just in birth records. (again, see the subheadings WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:BLPPRIVACY) You may be blocked from editing the next time you disrupt Wikipedia in this manner. Ionmars10 (talk) 21:30, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction
Hi Andhw. I'm sorry to do this, but I simply can't let you continue to contribute to BLPs while every single day there seems to be another suppressable BLP violation even after repeated warnings and advice from editors. It just seems to me that you're not getting it. I'm happy to consider lifting or easing this sanction if you can show me that you understand what's wrong with your edits and commit to avoiding in the future. Best, Kevin ( aka L235 · t · c) 21:42, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:05, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Sorry Kevin, I blocked indefinitely as you were applying the sanctions. If you use some pixie dust you'll see why.
 * Andhw, not only are you not abiding by one of our most fundamental policies, you are actively thumbing your nose at them with logged-out edits. If you are able to successfully appeal this block by posting a proper appeal, the discretionary sanctions will apply. I've also blocked the account you abaNdoned in order to start editing with this one.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:05, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Unblock request.
Please specifically describe the nature of your mistakes and how they relate to the biographies of living people policy. Since you will not, at least in the short term, be editing articles about living people(due to the sanction mentioned above), what topic areas will you edit about? 331dot (talk) 08:09, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

I will not use public records or any unreliable source ever again. I will edit any topic area that needs improvement. Andhw (talk) 15:36, 21 December 2019 (UTC)