User talk:Andise1/Archive 3

Speedy deletion nomination of Phoebe Bridgers


A tag has been placed on Phoebe Bridgers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Gbawden (talk) 10:49, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Stitches (rapper) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stitches (rapper) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Stitches (rapper)& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:47, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Topshelf Records, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clique (band). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Don't bite the newcomers!
Hey there,

I just noticed that you removed a paragraph created by an IP user on the Charley Crockett Wikipedia page. Perhaps instead of removing it, the section could be altered a bit and some sources added. After all, we were all beginners at one point.  Jasper  TECH (talk) 02:51, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
 * It's directly copied from here so I am again going to remove it and if someone wants the information back they can write it completely using their own words. Andise1 (talk) 03:13, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Ahh, my mistake - I did a direct search for the words used in the Wikipedia article, but that website didn't come up. Sorry about that.  Jasper  TECH (talk) 03:19, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
 * No worries! I do think the article could use a section like that though, so I'll try and create one when I have the chance. Andise1 (talk) 03:22, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Lung (band) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lung (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lung (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Narky Blert (talk) 20:50, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Charley Crockett
Hello Andise1,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Charley Crockett for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Mark Dask  03:40, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wildhoney (band)
Hello Andise1,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Wildhoney (band) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:32, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Instead of just tagging the article for deletion, an article that I presume you saw was adequately sourced for its size, you could have helped expand the article. There are plenty of articles out there with very poor or no sources, why not spend time looking at those articles instead? Not typing this to bash you or anything, but when sourcing isn't an issue the first thought should be expand, not delete. With bands, sometimes there is not much more to say other than what they have released, but the music they release is what makes them notable in the first place. Andise1 (talk) 07:57, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sports (band)


A tag has been placed on Sports (band), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 23:36, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Declined speedy deletion nomination of People Can’t Stop Chillin
Hello Andise1. Speedy deletion work is important and I do appreciate the effort. I would just ask that you please review the criteria carefully because accuracy is also important. On that issue, I have declined your speedy deletion nomination of People Can’t Stop Chillin as an article on a musical recording that does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the topic under CSD A9. That criterion did not apply because it is only for articles on musical recordings where none of the contributing recording artists has an article, and an article on Sports (band) exists. Adam9007 (talk) 01:58, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * , see the articles talk page on the reasoning why I tagged it as A9. After reading my message, you will understand my reasoning and hopefully can delete the article. Andise1 (talk) 02:02, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Well, this is confusing. It does indeed seem that there are two bands with that name: one formed in 2012, the other last year. Am I right? The one who produced this album is the new one whose article has been deleted? Adam9007 (talk) 02:08, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * someone created an article on a band called Sports from Oklahoma. They also created the page for one of the albums that band released, which I tagged for speedy deletion. I nominated the Oklahoma band's article for deletion (who released the album we are discussing), and it was closed as delete. I has previously created an article on another, more notable band called Sports from Ohio, who was moved into the Sports (band) article name space. The album for the Oklahoma band was never deleted. Does this make sense now? Andise1 (talk) 02:11, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, I think. Adam9007 (talk) 02:17, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of The Honey Trees for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Honey Trees is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Honey Trees until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Karst (talk) 07:36, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Magic Sword (band)


The article Magic Sword (band) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Appears to be promo page for a band that does not meet NMUSIC guidelines for notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Montanabw (talk) 07:50, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Free Cake for Every Creature for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Free Cake for Every Creature is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Free Cake for Every Creature until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @  23:16, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Susto (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nerdist. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Scarlet Rowe for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scarlet Rowe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Scarlet Rowe until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MPFitz1968 (talk) 07:05, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Can't Swim
 * added a link pointing to Alternative Press


 * Sleep On It (band)
 * added a link pointing to Have Mercy

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mouse on the Keys, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Business Times. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of The Newfound Interest In Connecticut for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Newfound Interest In Connecticut is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Newfound Interest In Connecticut until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 23:36, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of J. J. Totah for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article J. J. Totah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/J. J. Totah until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MB 14:29, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: $uicideboy$ (July 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AntiVan was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:$uicideboy$ and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AntiVan (talk) 05:26, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Auto-archiving
G'day, due to you having >150 subheadings on your talk page I have added an autoarchive script in order to archive any that have not had a reply in over 90 days. You are of course free to revert this change if you wish —   IVORK  Discuss 00:06, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bridge and Tunnel (band)


The article Bridge and Tunnel (band) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not a notable band."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 17:19, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Daytrader (band)


The article Daytrader (band) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not a notable band."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 17:22, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Country musicians
Category:American country musicians is a category that should contain only other categories. You should be using Category:American country singers instead. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 22:29, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lil Aaron


A tag has been placed on Lil Aaron requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Gbawden (talk) 13:56, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Field Medic for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Field Medic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Field Medic until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Comatmebro (talk) 22:48, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Sleep On It (band)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Sleep On It (band), Andise1!

Wikipedia editor Triptropic just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Nice work on the article about Sleep on it. Thank you for your contribution."

To reply, leave a comment on Triptropic's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Triptropic (talk) 22:52, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Snowmine
Hi, I'm Babymissfortune. Andise1, thanks for creating Snowmine!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This page is tagged for three issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Merry Christmas! Baby miss fortune 16:49, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Hailey Whitters
Hi, I'm Babymissfortune. Andise1, thanks for creating Hailey Whitters!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This page is tagged for two issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Merry Christmas! Baby miss fortune 16:57, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Mouse on the Keys
Hi, I'm Hzh. Andise1, thanks for creating Mouse on the Keys!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mouse_on_the_Keys#

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Hzh (talk) 11:32, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lomelda
Hello Andise1,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Lomelda for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

TheLongTone (talk) 14:52, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Joe Chrest) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Joe Chrest, Andise1!

Wikipedia editor Abishe just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Happy Holidays text.png Hello Andise1: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 08:56, 28 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

To reply, leave a comment on Abishe's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Abishe (talk) 08:56, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Hundred Acre Woods (band)


A tag has been placed on The Hundred Acre Woods (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Gbawden (talk) 13:41, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hoops (band)
Hello Andise1,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Hoops (band) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Enwebb (talk) 05:03, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:$uicideboy$
Draft:$uicideboy$, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:$uicideboy$ and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Draft:$uicideboy$ during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  14:37, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:$uicideboy$


A tag has been placed on Draft:$uicideboy$, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 00:34, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:$uicideboy$


A tag has been placed on Draft:$uicideboy$, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 06:04, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Prince Daddy & The Hyena
Hello, Andise1. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Prince Daddy & The Hyena, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit edit the page]
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:31, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Miley Cyrus - My Sad Christmas Song.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Miley Cyrus - My Sad Christmas Song.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sydney Eloise and the Palms


The article Sydney Eloise and the Palms has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails to meet notability requirements as per WP:BAND"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Grey joy talk 07:46, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ian Sweet


A tag has been placed on Ian Sweet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Boothsift (talk) 05:37, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bad Bad Hats


A tag has been placed on Bad Bad Hats requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. DannyS712 (talk) 02:05, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Young Jesus (band)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Young Jesus (band).

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 01:53, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Hot Flash Heat Wave for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hot Flash Heat Wave is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hot Flash Heat Wave until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @  02:58, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Josh Wolf Show title card.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Josh Wolf Show title card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:45, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Her's (band)


The article Her's (band) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:MUSICBIO"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WWGB (talk) 02:03, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Girl In Red) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Girl In Red.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Citrivescence (talk) 23:09, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Faye Webster for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Faye Webster is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Faye Webster until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Comatmebro (talk) 03:40, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Topshelf Records for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Topshelf Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Topshelf Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Daiyusha (talk) 06:51, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of CAAMP (band) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CAAMP (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/CAAMP (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 02:32, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Still Woozy


The article Still Woozy has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NMUSICIAN"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. John from Idegon (talk) 03:37, 13 August 2019 (UTC)