User talk:Andrés Buno

June 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Hồ dynasty, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 00:13, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Lê dynasty, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — MarkH21talk 07:11, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Nguyễn dynasty, you may be blocked from editing. ''You are continuing to remove referenced content and continuing to add unreferenced content about infobox parameters. Stop.'' — MarkH21talk 07:26, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Hi Andrés Buno! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Nguyễn dynasty that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia — it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. — MarkH21talk 07:48, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 June 14. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. This is your last warning; comments like are unacceptable. — MarkH21talk 07:57, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

BAN ME NOW, IF YOU HATE TO SEE
Wikipedia now is ran by bunch of totalitarianist tr*** who will dare to shut down anyone who have more knowledges and gentles than them. Where was my free and mattered Wikipedia 8 years ago? I am going to quit Wikipedia foverer, after 2 days of investigation and found out that ((they)) do not want you to know.

BAN BAN BAN Andrés Buno (talk) 08:15, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
 * You can edit civilly and use talk pages to discuss edits, instead of launching personal attacks and ranting when your edits are reverted. — MarkH21talk 08:26, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
 * By the way, Classical Chinese is a language and not a writing system, contrary to . Classical Chinese is not the same thing as Chinese characters. You’re confusing a written language with a writing system. — MarkH21talk 08:41, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. — MarkH21talk 08:33, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Edit warring on Vietnamese topics
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. Any admin may unblock if they become convinced that you will follow policy in the future. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 02:32, 16 June 2020 (UTC)