User talk:Andras0401

June 2013
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Gedeon Richter Ltd. a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Sarahj2107 (talk) 17:34, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi, firstly, I created a new page for RG, because Gedeon Richter LTD. company doesn't exists, it is a meaningless article. Gedeon Richter is a public listed company, while LTD means a private company so its needs correction. Secondly, I don't just copy the page if you see my edit... I completed nearly three times more meaningful the article, I copied just the facts, the history of the company and its acquisition, because it is a fact it can not do anything else with it. I don't know about this "Move Tab" option, because I'm a new user (even you can do it for me instead of delete my work), but you think it is a helpful help to delete my whole edit, what I can not restore now, and ruin my half a day work regarding the collection and organizing lot of data about the company? Thank you...


 * I'm sorry you lost your work but you can't copy any text to another page without proper attribution to the users who created it. The history of the edits needed to be moved as well. I requested that the redirect at Gedeon Richter be deleted so that Gedeon Richter LTD could be properly moved, which it now has been. You are now free to edit Gedeon Richter with updated information. Sarahj2107 (talk) 19:30, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Global cities
Hi, Why did you make this revert? You must have had some reason for adding a huge unreadable table to the article but you didn't provide an edit summary. It would be helpful if you could discuss the problem on the article's talkpage. bobrayner (talk) 15:33, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Edit warring
You're currently violation several key rules of Wikipedia. If one of your edits is reverted, you should not restore it, you should instead discuss it and gain a consensus (see WP:BRD). Not only do you violate this principle, you claim "these cannot be discussed". If that's your attitude, Wikipedia is not the place for you. On Wikipedia, discussion is key. Kindly self-revert your policy violations on Hungary. Failure to do so will lead to a report on your problematic behavior. Jeppiz (talk) 22:40, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Kindly read WP:OWN and WP:BRD. You do not have the right to just impose your version over and over again, while refusing to discuss or seek a consensus. Any further violations will be reported. Jeppiz (talk) 09:51, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Template:Hungary topics
Hi Andras0401, and thanks for your contributions. I undid at Template:Hungary topics because it goes against consensus about article naming of the topic of the link you changed. If you wish to discuss this, please raise the issue at Template talk:Hungary topics. Cordially, Mathglot (talk) 06:04, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Also, please consider adding an edit summary to your contributions. This helps other editors see what changes are being made and why.  You can find more information about this at Help:Edit summary. Cordially, Mathglot (talk) 06:17, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Taxation in Hungary
Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://doingbusinessinhungary.com/taxation. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:48, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Budapest Business School
I undid your revert on Budapest Business School. Having a reference is necessary but not sufficient.

You may have missed my edit summary where I explained that I was removing it because it appears to be copied from material that is subject to for copyright. (Some of it is uencyclopedic, but that's another issue)

For the record, the material appears to closely match the material at this site.

I occasionally make errors, if what appears to be the source was actually copied from Wikipedia, please let me know.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  14:35, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rákosmente, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page György Kiss. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 10 August 2021 (UTC)