User talk:AndreCF

Uncited and unexplained changes to articles
Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you.

You have made several changes to the articles Mains electricity by country and Three-phase electric power. Although your contribution is entirely welcome, none of your changes were supported by the required references and none of them were explained in the edit summary - thus they have been reverted.

Further: any content added or changes made must be supported by a reliable and verifiable source supporting such a change. Please refer to reliable sources and verifiability for further information. I note that you seem to be a new editor to Wikipedia. It may be that your changes were made in good faith, but should you wish to reintroduce them, you must supply the required verifiable and reliable source(s) to support them.

Although there is no evidence of any malfeasance on your part, the absence of an edit summary is a frequent indication of vandalism to an article and many editors will auto-revert an unexplained change on these grounds alone.

Thanking you for taking an interest in contributing to Wikipedia. 86.157.171.171 (talk) 13:07, 14 February 2013 (UTC)