User talk:AndreCarrotflower

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:13, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Reliable sources
Hi. Please read WP:RS and WP:ALBUM/REVSIT for information on what does and does not constitute a reliable source. For example, Rolling Stone is considered to be a professional review source on WP:ALBUM/REVSIT, while the source you are providing does not appear to have "a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy" per WP:RS. If you think this site is a professional review source, then please bring your evidence supporting this to WT:ALBUM and it can be discussed there. Thank you. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 05:42, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Buffalo mayoral election, 2013, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! j⚛e deckertalk 15:19, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your GA nomination of Buffalo mayoral election, 2005
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Buffalo mayoral election, 2005 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TonyTheTiger -- 17:12, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Buffalo mayoral election, 2001
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Buffalo mayoral election, 2001 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TonyTheTiger -- 17:12, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Buffalo mayoral election, 2005
The article Buffalo mayoral election, 2005 you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Buffalo mayoral election, 2005 for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TonyTheTiger -- 17:22, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Buffalo mayoral election, 2001
The article Buffalo mayoral election, 2001 you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Buffalo mayoral election, 2001 for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TonyTheTiger -- 17:22, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Wiknic for Buffalo?
User:Mitchazenia has started a proposal to have a Wiknic in Buffalo, New York. You can add your comments here: Wiknic for Buffalo?. BuffaloBob (talk) 15:03, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * The date has been changed to August 2nd. See Meetup/Buffalo.  BuffaloBob (talk) 22:21, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Black mold listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Black mold. Since you had some involvement with the Black mold redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.  Paine Ellsworth  put'r there  13:34, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

November 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Michigan State Prison. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 00:19, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * I added the reliable source as you directed. Parenthetically, this kind of thing is Exhibit A of why I'm far less active on Wikipedia than at other WMF sites. If you people want to know why you've got an editor retention crisis on your hands, look no further than pettiness and newbie-biting like this. "Disruptive editing"... pfft. -- AndreCarrotflower (talk) 00:33, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Knox Farm State Park
Andre, your new picture on Knox Farm State Park is nice. It would have been better if you could have also found a place on the page to leave the old photo. Just a suggestion. BuffaloBob (talk) 02:15, 24 July 2019 (UTC)


 * IMO, a <5KB stub article doesn't benefit from including two photographs that depict basically the same thing. -- AndreCarrotflower (talk) 02:56, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of City of Buffalo landmarks and historic districts, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Allentown Historic District and University Park Historic District ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_City_of_Buffalo_landmarks_and_historic_districts check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_City_of_Buffalo_landmarks_and_historic_districts?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:28, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of 2005 Buffalo mayoral election for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2005 Buffalo mayoral election is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mayoral elections until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wow (talk) 22:44, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of churches in the Roman Catholic Diocese of Buffalo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Seth Thomas ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_churches_in_the_Roman_Catholic_Diocese_of_Buffalo check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_churches_in_the_Roman_Catholic_Diocese_of_Buffalo?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Delaware Avenue Historic District
First: you take amazing pictures of Buffalo buildings - I look forward to seeing more now that good weather is coming again! Second: I understand why you removed the photos/buildings from Delaware Avenue Historic District (Buffalo, New York) page -- I knew when I was adding them that they probably belonged elsewhere but wasn't sure of the exact parameters of the district vs. the buildings. So just a quick note to say thanks for keeping the page tight and accurate! DACC23 (talk) 17:47, 26 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the compliment! Photography is definitely a hobby that I've been rediscovering during these pandemic times, and I'm always glad to see my work get used for purposes other than my own pleasure. commons:Category:Photos taken by Andre Carrotflower in Buffalo, New York is where you'll find the full compendium, in case it's of use to you in your future work.


 * And kudos are also in order for your impressive work on the Delaware Avenue Historic District-related articles. I'm glad I was able to help clarify things with my contributions. As I'm sure you know, most of the buildings in that general area of Buffalo are impressive and historic, and the geographical breakdown of which buildings belong to which district is not always intuitive for the observer on the ground. The "Buffalo as an Architectural Museum" website, which I see you're already aware of, has pages clarifying the boundaries of each of the city's locally- and NRHP-listed historic districts. Another resource is the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation's CRIS database, which includes not only the nomination documents for every NRHP-listed property in the state, but also inventory forms for many non-listed properties too, and all kinds of other valuable information. It requires registration, but it's free of charge. Let me know if you need me to dig up any information, I'd be happy to help.


 * -- AndreCarrotflower (talk) 18:12, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Knox Farm State Park Photo
Andre, user:Aidanmcl posted some new photos on the page Knox Farm State Park. In doing so, he removed your photo, which is far better in my opinion. My first thought was to revert it, but then I though it best to discuss with you. How would you prefer to proceed? BuffaloBob (talk) 17:22, 24 March 2022 (UTC)