User talk:Andrea EDASA

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rinaldo Altieri (October 2)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rinaldo Altieri and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Andrea_EDASA Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MatthewVanitas&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Andrea_EDASA reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 23:21, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Svitino has been accepted
 Svitino, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 14:05, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Andrea_EDASA help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Draft:Rinaldo Altieri concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Rinaldo Altieri, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Rinaldo Altieri


Hello, Andrea EDASA. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Rinaldo Altieri".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 03:09, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Clitocybe catinus moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Clitocybe catinus, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kadane (talk) 00:07, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

About Clitocybe cantinus
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Clitocybe cantinus a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. Kadane (talk) 00:10, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Please preview, consolidate, and summarize
Hello Andrea, and thanks for your edits on Leccinum aurantiacum. I removed your inline note calling for a reference, as the preferred way to do that on Wikipedia is with the Citation needed template Please add that there if you feel it is appropriate. Also, please try to preview, consolidate, and summarize your edits: Thanks in advance for considering these suggestions. Eric talk 17:13, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Try to consolidate your edits, at least at the section level, to avoid cluttering the page's edit history; this makes it easier for your fellow editors to understand your intentions, and makes it easier for those monitoring activity on the article.
 * The show preview button (beside the "publish changes" button) is helpful for this; use it to view your changes incrementally before finally saving the page once you're satisfied with your edits.
 * Please remember to explain each edit with an edit summary (box above the "publish changes" button).

Nomination of Bruno Cetto for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bruno Cetto is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bruno Cetto until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sheldybett (talk) 05:00, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Andrea EDASA


A tag has been placed on User:Andrea EDASA requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dom from Paris (talk) 11:50, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message
which page has been incriminated? i cannot see its content... and if so, why the reason? Andrea EDASA (talk) 05:57, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

i don't know that much of the candidates... Andrea EDASA (talk) 06:00, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

is wikipedia considering any economical contribute to his supervisors? Andrea EDASA (talk) 06:01, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Clitocybe catinus


Hello, Andrea EDASA. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Clitocybe catinus".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 19:38, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

About tricholoma terreum
it seems to be a debate weather it is edible or poisonous this is the sitta comment you provide https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/chem.201406655 and the researcher responds it is poisonous https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26945891 i couldn't find any other research stating of the compounds. the one that does state the compounds says it is poisonous. https://dl.uswr.ac.ir/bitstream/Hannan/61275/1/2019%20JoAFC%20Volume%2067%20Issue%2018%20May%20%286%29.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.226.12.225 (talk) 11:31, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Please read carefully this article:

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1541-4337.12374

The Tricholoma Chianese article mention the content of a toxin in the Tricholoma terreum saing that it could be the same toxin which caused rhabdomyolysis in equestre. Now on top of Sitta comments, please refer below:

1) first of all they did the study on an animal, no POC on humans 2) second the quantity involved is far too low to have an effect on human 3) point 2 is supported by the 2018 article

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1541-4337.12374

where clearly the author demonstrates how the case of equestre is only due to abnormal consuption and nothing wrong with a normal meal of about 200g. Now if the quantity of toxine in terreum is smaller (Chianese article) than in equestre, then in principle 200g or more of terreum are absolutely safe.

4) for the best of my knowledge I am not aware of any clinical case about terreum. If the Chinese authors were correct, and considering the large tradition of consuption of terreum, one should expect several clinical poisoning cases from terreum, where are they? just zero. Total zero...

The logical conclusion is that: yes they have found a toxine in terreum, but the quantity of that toxine is absolutely irrelevant for harming a human being, unless an absnormal quantity is ingested (note that for the cases of equestre, as reported in the mentioned article, they ingested 3-5 kg per day for several weeks... So...)

thanks for the attention

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)