User talk:Andreaharvey

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Andreaharvey. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Reuben Singh, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Edwardx (talk) 23:46, 26 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi Edwardx
 * I recognise you are a well versed and noted contributor. I feel it unfair that you have totally disregarded all my contribution. I am not paid nor a client or have any association with the subject matter. However I am researching British Entrepreneurs and when I studied this individual and then compared it to the the wikipedia listing I felt it was written in a way to negatively portray him. I felt my contribution was balanced but I am more than happy to be guided by you in direction. I did not delete anything previously written at all but the wikipedia listing had nothing noted since at least the last 8 years whilst the subject has much to be added as factual relevance. Do you not agree? Andreaharvey (talk) 22:29, 28 November 2022 (UTC)