User talk:Andreahawleypr

Nomination of Angel More for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Angel More is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Angel More until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  16:57, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  16:59, 1 July 2016 (UTC)


 * As your name suggests you are a professional PR person, might I suggest you read WP:COI about conflict of interest, and also our terms of use WP:TOU as any editing for pay or reward MUST be declared? Please also read WP:ATHLETE about notability for athletes, and WP:BIO about general biographies. WP:RS is essential reading - about reliable independent sources. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a directory or social media, and we insist on reliable independent referencing to prove notability. Peridon (talk) 20:28, 1 July 2016 (UTC)