User talk:AndreasZander

Anshe Chung
I'm trying to improve the article; could you please explain what's wrong with it, rather than reverting to a revision that several people agree is flawed? Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 19:27, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * That the pictures constituted pornography or sexual assault is his opinion, not an indisputable fact. WP:NPOV requires that we attribute opinions to sources instead of stating them as fact. That he issued copyright takedowns is undisputed fact.  That she offered erotic services has never actually been disputed. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 19:54, 22 January 2007 (UTC)