User talk:Andreas Philopater/2015

Nathaniel Westlake
I see that you created this article and cited his entry in "Stained Glass Marks and Monograms" by Joyce Little. Do you still have access to this publication? I have recently created an article on Francis Skeat and I would be most grateful if you could add any additional information that may be contained in Little's book. Thanks for any help you can give. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 07:03, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry - as a translator I move from topic to topic, and don't get to the bottom of any of them. I don't have a copy of this book in my possession. (I can find it in a library, but I imagine it would be just as much trouble for me as for you.) --Andreas Philopater (talk) 14:01, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrolled
Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:
 * This permission does not give you any special status or authority
 * Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
 * You may wish to display the Autopatrolled top icon and/or the User wikipedia/autopatrolled userbox on your user page
 * If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
 * If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   00:47, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
So obvious : great job Andreas. Would you(*) mind performing the same on Azzam Pasha quotation that needs the same work not much more difficult as for the bride married to another man...

(*) Why you and not me ? Because there is right now a momentum and you have a "virginity" on the topics related to the I-P conflict that will permit to make improvements fast and with consensus around you.

Pluto2012 (talk) 21:17, 20 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the vote of confidence, but having looked at the Azzam Pasha quotation article, I think it is rather more of a hornet's nest than this one, and I'm not especially inclined to touch a question so far from my areas of expertise. I tried to trim back "bride is beautiful" to something that addressed the issues raised at AFD (which is one of the things that AFD is good for). I wouldn't know how to begin to do the same for Azzam Pasha. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 21:34, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Aileen Soares
Hi! I see you have kept the article in your userspace. I nominated it for deletion but changed my mind after going into detail, however it was still deleted. I want to take it back to the mainspace but will need to work on the structure first. Would you mind if I do the modifications in your space? Samar Talk 08:01, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Never mind, I have re-created the article, please see this. Samar  Talk 12:01, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, that doesn't seem to have lasted long. Do feel free to work in my userspace until we have something speedy-proof. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 20:19, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, unfortunately another admin immediately deleted it. Again notability issue. Also I could find only 4-5 good references in newspaper and a couple more in the school website but nothing beyond that and information about her is very limited. With this I am sure the article will be deleted again, unless she wins an award or more information about her is available. Samar  Talk 05:47, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Would you be willing to put all the references/info you have in the userspace version? I'd like to take a look. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 06:37, 29 August 2012 (UTC)


 * References
 * School website
 * - short biography on the SJC website
 * - no substantial info


 * The Express Tribune
 * - No extensive details except that she will receive a 'bouquet'
 * 
 * 
 * 


 * Dawn News
 * 

Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs

 * Thanks, I'm flattered. What did you have in mind? "Did you know that the first Polish Royal Posts were run by Italian bankers?" --Andreas Philopater (talk) 15:19, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
 * That sounds interesting enough, I'd just add a note about 16th century somewhere. Let me know if you need any assistance with the DYKing process. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 23:25, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Please note that due to DYKs being on a time limit (~5 days since the article's creation), it should be nominated today. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 16:26, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Piotr, I'm sure Andreas won't mind if you nominate this article yourself before the time runs out before the end of the day. Cheers! Poeticbent talk 17:54, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
 * There, all done. Although I'm not sure I did it right. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 22:37, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

I don't intend to change Vilnius, but this case is different from Kraków. Kraków name stayed the same throughout history, as far as its mostly Polish speaking inhabitants were concerned. Vilnius, however, became throughout polonized, to a degree that its Lithuanian name was not used much for several centuries (it was inhabited, in 1939, by something like 40% Poles, 40% Jews, and <10% Lithuanians). The name Wilno is also used in English literature. It is often a good idea to mention it in text if the subject is related to Poland and concerns the polonized period. It is not required, though. (It's a little bit like the Constantinopole/Instanbul case, for example; see also WP:NCGN for some relevant reading). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 16:33, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, reading that, what strikes me is that if a widely accepted historic English name for a specific historical context has preference, and it should be followed by the modern English name in parentheses on the first occurrence of the name in applicable sections of the article in the format: "historical name (modern name)", then we should be using Cracow in the Montelupi article, with Cracow (Kraków) at first mention... --Andreas Philopater (talk) 22:46, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Not a bad job for your first DYK entry. Keep up the good work!--SGCM (talk)  22:59, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Sebastiano Montelupi
Hello! Your submission of Sebastiano Montelupi at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SGCM (talk)  22:57, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Roberto Bandinelli for DYK
If you could expand it just by 50 words, it will no longer be a stub, and will be eligible for DYKing, too. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 18:04, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Busy week. No way I can do that in time. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 20:55, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Sebastiano Montelupi
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:02, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Followup RFC to WP:RFC/AAT now in community feedback phase
Hello. As a participant in Requests for comment/Abortion article titles, you may wish to register an opinion on its followup RFC, Requests for comment/Abortion advocacy movement coverage, which is now in its community feedback phase. Please note that WP:RFC/AAMC is not simply a repeat of WP:RFC/AAT, and is attempting to achieve better results by asking a more narrowly-focused, policy-based question of the community. Assumptions based on the previous RFC should be discarded before participation, particularly the assumption that Wikipedia has or inherently needs to have articles covering generalized perspective on each side of abortion advocacy, and that what we are trying to do is come up with labels for that. Thanks! —chaos5023 20:25, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Roberto Bandinelli
Hi Andreas Philopater. Please, see your new baby at Template:Did you know nominations/Roberto Bandinelli. Cheers, Poeticbent talk 17:22, 25 October 2012 (UTC) Thanks Poeticbent. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 21:52, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Roberto Bandinelli
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:04, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Treccani image
Hi Andreas. I saw your question in the edit summary. The image on it.wiki cannot be transferred to Commons because it's not quite free. But I believe it's "free enough" for en.wiki so you can copy the image on it.wiki and upload it on en.wiki. You should also copy the source info from it.wiki and use the template PD-Italy. I should say that while I have a solid understanding of the basic rules surrounding images on en.wiki, I'm no expert so you might want to double-check the info I just gave. Cheers, Pichpich (talk) 02:57, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

File:TheArtist (journal) cover.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:TheArtist (journal) cover.jpg

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 09:15, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Kraków
Just to explain my edit to the Kraków article, I want the article to provide information on how the Poles and Jews of Kraków were treated not how those two groups in general were treated. Rsloch (talk) 15:06, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Your edit does not have this effect. That the Nazis envisioned a city ethnically cleansed of Poles and Jews is hardly inconsequential to their treatment. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 15:45, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Didier Pollefeyt
Hi Andreas,

Thanks for the coomments on Didier Pollefeyt. I made some changes to the external references, adding google books, policy documents and news paper articles. The links to the sources within KULeuven are kept for the reader's convenience.

I hope this meets your expectations (I undid the banner you added). If not, please contact me.

Theology002 (talk) 07:28, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

MiG29VN
I wish to warn you about MiG29VN's behavior. He has falsely, deceptively and deviously blamed me of "vandalism" (as evidence here) and explained here (the paragraph begins with "The main reason the inclusion of the Hue Massacre "Dispute/Denial" section"'), in order to get other editors to swiftly remove content from others that he doesn't like and get editors on his side. Now he's blaming you for "vandalism". This is just to let you know what he's doing.
 * Thank you for your message. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 22:51, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi Andreas! Yeah, I had a back and forth with another Editor last week, and I don't have the skills or time to populate all of the links and whatever needs to be done. I'm older, and all of this is terribly confusing to me. I just bit off more than I can chew here, so I'll have somebody do all of the necessary things at some point in the future. I understand that all of this will be deleted, and that's fine.

Thanks for taking the time to send me a message! I'll revisit all of this when I can hire someone qualified to do all of the technical stuff that is so beyond me.

Julian

Scott Card racist?
(Note: Per wp:CANVASSING I am "non-biasedly" advertising a topic for discussion by posting a notice on the ten most recent users who commented on the page in question's talkpage and also the ten most recent users who edited the article in question.) Commentators continue to reference/allege Card's piece involving a fictional, future Obama's coup d'état by way of urban guirillas as racist (eg see here in Slate, 2013; here, HuffPo, 2013; here, Wired, 2014). Should our article mention this aspect of controversy with regard to the piece here: "Orson Scott Card"? (Also see a 2013 blogpost by M Aspan citing this from Card in 2000 rgding allegedly non-racist use of nigga'.) See discussion here: Talk:Orson Scott Card  --Hodgdon&#39;s secret garden (talk) 21:37, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Speed
I just happened to be flicking through New Pages. I was always getting tagged when I started, doing things in draft (eg. creating a page User:Andreas Philopater/Audrey Butt Colson) with a userspace draft template on top, working on it gradually, and transferring it onto the main Wikipedia site afterwards made life a lot simpler. --The Vintage Feminist (talk) 20:36, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Copyright notices
Hey Andreas. Appreciate the tagging of Sonoma State University School of Science and Technology as a copyvio. It's important work. Just came her to clarify an issue that is raised by what you wrote on the now deleted talk page. We assume full and non-free copyright unless there's a specific and compatible free copyright license (or public domain release) that can be positively shown. Part of the reason for this is pragmatism, but it's also because non-free copyright of sufficiently creative works automatically vests in the owner of the work upon creation and no displayed license is needed under copyright law for the copyright to obtain (there are some exceptions like works of employees of the U.S. Federal government created as part of that person's official duties, but they're beyond the scope here). All this is to say that you don't need to bother hunting down whether the source of copied and pasted text bears an affirmative notice, or worry if you find none. You only want to take a quick glance to see if there's a notice to avoid tagging something that actually has a free license. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:03, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the clarification! --Andreas Philopater (talk) 03:43, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Antoine Faydherbe
Thanks so much for your work on the Faydherbe family of sculptors! I really appreciate it. I noticed you didn't find the Wikidata link for Antoine Faydherbe, which I just linked. It would be nice if you could do this yourself in future (and create the item if it doesn't exist yet). If you have any questions on Wikidata and/or would like some tips for working with items, please let me know. I will be connecting the family relationships on Wikidata based on your work so that these will show up in Reasonator. Thanks, Jane (talk) 10:23, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * You're very welcome. I still haven't got used to not using interwiki links. What might Reasonator be? --Andreas Philopater (talk) 10:59, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Reasonator is one of the links on the left side of your screen when you are looking at an item in Wikidata. For example, here is the Reasonator page for Antoine Reasonator page for Q2109015. Wikidata is much more than just sitelinks. Happy data editing! Jane (talk) 11:42, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Dutch/Belgian Dutch/Flemish
Hi Andreas, I came here to let you know I'd responded to you at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Belgium but couldn't see how I'd first contacted you so I've had to start a new section. Thanks for responding previously. Jan (JDE)78.149.231.228 (talk) 14:42, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Category:1722 establishments in Belgium
Category:1722 establishments in Belgium, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Tim! (talk) 06:32, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1650s in Belgium


A tag has been placed on Category:1650s in Belgium requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for four days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Fayenatic  L ondon 09:41, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the notification . It was parent to a category that was deleted without comment a few days ago, having been emptied without discussion. If I knew what had originally been in it, I might suggest what it could be renamed as / moved to. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 10:18, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * The deleted sub-cat was Category:1658 in Belgium. You created it on 25 Jan 2015... and from your contribs I trace the first member page as League of the Rhine, added by you, and recategorised by Marcocapelle. – Fayenatic  L ondon 21:45, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I looked but I couldn't spot anything. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 22:42, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Work of today
It seems we were working on the same thing at the same day, it was entirely coincidental, I was just following up on this post on my talk page. Pretty unfortunate for both of us. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:39, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I didn't for a moment suspect you of setting out to trip me up, and I would hope you don't imagine I'm doing anything similar. There are only so many wet and windy Saturday afternoons in a year, after all, and a job like this takes a couple of hours to be done properly. Incidentally, I've spotted quite a number of articles categorised as "Year in Europe" that could be recategorised to Dutch Republic, Habsburg Netherlands, or Southern Netherlands. So even without adding articles, the number of articles in those categories could be expanded considerably. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 18:11, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Beguinage. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. –– Unbuttered parsnip  (talk) mytime= Sun 02:19, wikitime=  18:19, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * Since you started reverting my edits, and continue to do so, in favour of unsourced, speculative content that reads like you sucked it out of your own thumb, without responding to talkpage comments, and I haven't reverted you back more than once in any 24-hour period, I think you might want to reconsider this approach.--Andreas Philopater (talk) 13:39, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Ren Zhiqiang
Hi there, thanks for creating Ren Zhiqiang. I've expanded it a bit and nominated the article for DYK. You may wish to keep an eye on the nomination page. Cheers, -Zanhe (talk) 06:43, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:29, 3 March 2016 (UTC)