User talk:Andreeaep10

May 2015
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Pea, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 07:45, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Maple syrup
I undid your to Maple syrup. Please use an encyclopedic wp:tone, not a narration. Please use wp:inline citations and not wp:bare URLs as you did in Maple syrup. For citing a web site, please consider using. This would go between the (exclude the nowiki) Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 07:54, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
Your recent editing history at Maple syrup shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —C.Fred (talk) 16:07, 1 May 2015 (UTC)