User talk:Andrei.computer

CalcSys
You probably moved too fast with this. You need at least one independent source to indicate a subject's Notability. I see something of this name appear in a few blogs, which are generally not considered the most reliable sources. It might mention a sentence or two in the calculator article? W Nowicki (talk) 18:36, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Not sure what you are asking. The one source listed is a download link, and from that I can verify that there is indeed a zip file there to download. If you read the like above, it says" if no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, then it should not have a separate article. " The download link is not independent, and not "third party". There certainly might be some, but the burden of proof would be on the person proposing the article to show at least one. There are millions of "apps" and other software that people can download, and alas, WIkipedia can only cover the ones that are noted by someone besides the authors. I do try to help new authors, but other editors are quicker on the deletion unless you give them some evidence. Thanks for your patience. W Nowicki (talk) 20:47, 15 July 2011 (UTC)