User talk:Andrei Iosifovich

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Maelwys (talk) 21:20, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Job queue
I was just wondering why edits to template boxes are either not effective or not immediately effective. Is there something particular about them that delays or doesn't allow changes, at least from certain editors? Thanks. Andrei Iosifovich (talk) 03:49, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The delay in seeing your changes take affect occurs because of a bug in the page caching. When you edit a template, the software sometimes doesn't realize that the changes to the template have an effect on pages which use the template. Since the actual source text of the page itself remains the same, the software thinks that it is ok to show the cached version of the page without rebuilding it with the template changes. At the template help page there are some tips for clearing the cache and getting the latest changes to show. I hope that answers your question. --Megaboz (talk) 04:25, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * This is not actually a "bug". It has to do with how busy the servers are. When you edit a template, the servers must update all of the pages which the template is transcluded on. However, if the servers are overloaded, then this is put onto the back of the job queue for later processing, when the servers are less stressed. To force the servers to update the template transclusion on any particular page, perform a null edit to that page. Happy editing!--Aervanath lives in  the Orphanage  04:28, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Template:RGSPresidents
Hi there Andrei, what's with removing the redlinks? These exist for a reason - they encourage users to fill in the gaps! From Red link: ''A red link, like this one, signifies a link to a page that does not exist in Wikipedia. Sometimes it is useful in editing article text to create a red link to indicate that a page will be created soon or that an article should be created for the topic because it would be notable and verifiable.'' I'm sure that Prof Michael Wise (for example) amply fulfils this criterion. Pterre (talk) 16:29, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

List of couples with British titles in their own right
Hi. Well-done. Excellent job. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 23:58, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi. You rv - The 1st Earl of Stockton and Dame Dorothy Macmillan from the article. Did you forget to restore them after resectioning? I did not replace as I don't know if it was intentional or unintentional on your part. Yours, Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 11:46, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that. I was uncertain whether they merited a position, since Harold Macmillan was only a peer after his wife's death. I initially removed it, meant to put it back if I could see other similar examples, and ended up forgetting and leaving it out. If you think it should be there I certainly won't remove it again. Andrei Iosifovich (talk) 23:06, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:46, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

November 2010
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Iago, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 20:23, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space
Hey there Andrei Iosifovich, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Andrei Iosifovich.


 * See a log of files removed today here.
 * Shut off the bot here.
 * Report errors here.
 * If you have any questions, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:05, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Category:Fictional heirs apparent who never acceded
Category:Fictional heirs apparent who never acceded, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. JDDJS (talk) 18:26, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi, the category is now a list: List of fictional heirs apparent who never acceded. Feel free to improve it, e.g. adding reasons why the characters never acceded. – Fayenatic  L ondon 08:42, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

AfD for Royal descendants of John William Friso, Prince of Orange
Hi, It looks like you created the article Royal descendants of John William Friso, Prince of Orange. It was recently nominated for deletion here and it seems like you were not notified of the nomination. I thought you might like to comment before the AfD closes. -   t  u coxn \ talk 04:15, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Jan. 5, 2017
i am sorry for undoing your edit JueLinLi (talk) 04:01, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Sackville, Lord Buckhurst, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lord Buckhurst. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of last scions


The article List of last scions has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The scope of this article is unclear, potentially huge. Its encyclopedic relevance is dubious. Also, it is not a list of individuals at all."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Surtsicna (talk) 23:14, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of List of fictional heirs apparent who never acceded for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of fictional heirs apparent who never acceded is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of fictional heirs apparent who never acceded until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Fayenatic  L ondon 21:10, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Brazilian Imperial Family (present)
Template:Brazilian Imperial Family (present) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Guy (help!) 09:59, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of heirs to the Portuguese throne


The article List of heirs to the Portuguese throne has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No citations. Earlier entries, such as Sophia and Ingeborg of Denmark are dubious at best and probably fanciful."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Celia Homeford (talk) 11:51, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of List of heirs to the Portuguese throne for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of heirs to the Portuguese throne is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of heirs to the Portuguese throne until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Celia Homeford (talk) 13:10, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of heirs to the Austrian throne


The article List of heirs to the Austrian throne has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No references"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DrKay (talk) 07:05, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of List of heirs to the Monegasque throne for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of heirs to the Monegasque throne is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of heirs to the Monegasque throne until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. DrKay (talk) 11:36, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Sort keys that are not in page name
Hi, I noticed that the sort key "St Pol" for the article Joan, Countess of Ligny was added by you many years ago. This is one of several sort keys for members of Category:French suo jure nobility which are not helpful, since the key words do not appear in the page names. Please would you revise or remove any such sort keys in that category? – Fayenatic  L ondon 07:48, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I have removed those sort keys. If any articles in that category require a better sort key than the current one, please choose another word that appears in the page name. – Fayenatic  L ondon 23:07, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)