User talk:Andrew3069

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I was hoping you might be willing to fill in some of the redlinks of that band-stub you just wrote. Where did you get the information for the article? Did that band ever tour, to your knowledge,or release any CD's? Were they signed to a recording contract/label? It's good to have bands that may have spawned famous members mentioned in WP (it may be the only time anyone ever reads about them outside of their town), but there are certain criteria at [] that bands must meet as a standard. I'll watch this page for citations, but if none are forthcoming in say, the next 24 hours, I'll have to tag it for deletion. Unless someone else does it first, which is a possibility. Hope you understand the logic of minimum criteria though! See ya 'round! Hamster Sandwich 04:43, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Some general (unofficial) guidelines for bands, etc. are here. Have fun contributing! worthawholebean talkcontribs 04:53, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

The Rodeo Boys
An article that you have been involved in editing, The Rodeo Boys, has been listed at Articles for deletion/The Rodeo Boys. Please look there to see why this is, if you are interested in whether it should be deleted. Thank you. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 18:00, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Mark Cousins (writer)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Mark Cousins (writer), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you. --B. Wolterding (talk) 16:20, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Family of Free Love
A tag has been placed on Family of Free Love requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - - [ The Spooky One ] | [ t c r ] 04:34, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tristan Moyer
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Tristan Moyer, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. B. Wolterding (talk) 16:50, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Andrew3069! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:48, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Clayton Scrivner -

Proposed deletion of Corlene Byrd


The article Corlene Byrd has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced; notability therefore unclear

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SlimVirgin talk| contribs 04:31, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Captain Go


A tag has been placed on Captain Go requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:31, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Captain Go


The article Captain Go has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non notable band. Deprodded for having notable members, but the band doesn't seem to have done anything of note. 'Marty Crandall' + 'Captain Go' turns up nothing on Google that isn't a Wikipedia mirror."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:45, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of The Rodeo Boys (2nd nomination) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Rodeo Boys (2nd nomination) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Rodeo Boys (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.