User talk:Andrew93429

Nomination of Stock's Gambit for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Stock's Gambit, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Stock's Gambit until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Shadowjams (talk) 09:14, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

November 2010
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Andrew Stock, you may be blocked from editing. Shadowjams (talk) 11:49, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Stock's Gambit


The article Stock's Gambit has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * hoax and made up just days ago

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 18:57, 17 November 2010 (UTC)


 * See Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 18:58, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Stock's "gambit"
Why is it a hoax? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrew93429 (talk • contribs) 02:51, 18 November 2010 (UTC)


 * It obviously isn't serious. First, Wikipedia uses verifiable sources and reliable sources and not a publisher of original research.  Second, Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a blog (wp:NOT). Third, in this particular case, no one could take such a queen sacrifice seriously, especially since it was made up by a grade school player with a USCF rating under 1000.  Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 03:27, 18 November 2010 (UTC)


 * PS- see what others have to say at Articles for deletion/Stock's Gambit. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 03:31, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:14, 23 November 2010 (UTC)