User talk:AndrewBlueTone

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Medical College of Georgia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 00:09, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Status and Advice
Unfortunately, As reviewing administrator, I had to delete the article, because it was essentially a copy of their web site. Even had you gotten the proper permission, according to WP:DCM, I would still have deleted it as highly promotional. (I regret that the careless reviewer approved it, and I will give him some advice about that.) A Wikipedia article needs to be written like an encyclopedia article, not a press release--don't praise the organization or person, say what they do. Don't talk about their excellence. We do not to copy from a web site, even with permission, because the tone will not be encyclopedic and the material will not be suitable. (Thus, there is generally no purpose in giving permission; it is better to rewrite.) As a general rule, a suitable page will be best written by someone without Conflict of Interest; it's not impossible to do it properly with a conflict of interest or as a paid press agent, but it's relatively more difficult: you are automatically thinking in terms of what the subject wishes to communicate to the public, but an uninvolved person will think in terms of what the public might wish to know.

As I often work here on university articles, I will myself construct a stub page on it. I strongly advise you to let others work on it further. If there is material you want to add, suggest it on the talk page, unless you are absolutely certain it is just objective facts that others not connected with the university would expect to find in an encyclopedia, and unless you are absolutely certain that it avoids not just outright copyvio but Close paraphrase. In basing an article on outside material, it is necessary to rewrite from scratch, and avoid reusing not just the words, but the arrangement into sentences and the sequence of ideas. I'm posting two formal warning here for the record, about promotion and copyvio.  DGG ( talk ) 04:09, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

February 2013
This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  DGG ( talk ) 04:09, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.  DGG ( talk ) 04:09, 10 February 2013 (UTC)